Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,496 of 3,113    |
|    Peter Fairbrother to Rick Jones    |
|    Re: Polythene tanks?    |
|    04 Feb 05 14:46:52    |
      From: zenadsl6186@zen.co.uk              Rick Jones wrote:              > Peter Fairbrother wrote:              >> Why should spaceflight be significantly less safe than air travel? It       doesn't       >> have to be.       >       > While I suppose some of the lessons learned in the 100 year history of       > powered aviation might be applied to spaceflight, given that       > spaceflight is only 40 years old or so - one might consider it even       > younger I suppose if you want to say "commercial spaceflight" would it       > perhaps be better to hold it to a standard closer to that of aviation       > at age 40 or so?              Perhaps age 60 or so, what with future shock and the increasing pace of       development.              That would be about equivalent to 1960's aviation - which wasn't that much       less safe then today's. To put numbers on it, perhaps one fatality per       1,000,000 passenger-flights? I have no idea if that's right, but it sounds       like a ballpark minimum.              But people are talking about fatality rates for space travel of around one       per 10,000 or 1,000 passenger-flights, or even 1 per 100 (approx. Shuttle       rate), which is very significantly worse, and in my view completely       unacceptable, certainly for space tourism purposes.                     I don't really think we could easily get parity with today's aviation fatal       accident rate (about 1 in 20,000,000) but we have to do a lot better than       that. That means lots of r+d, testing, design, quality building, flight       testing and experience, and that needs lots of capital. You need at least a       billion and a half, preferably more, a 100 million or two won't cut it.                     [..]              > (I wonder if the safety of a bizjet is actually better than that of       > commercial aviation?)              I wondered that too, but if you can afford a bizjet you can presumably set       the level of maintenance, pilot training etc to suit your safety needs.                     --       Peter Fairbrother              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca