Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,498 of 3,113    |
|    Len Lekx to All    |
|    Re: Serious propulsion    |
|    04 Feb 05 11:37:52    |
      From: LFLekx@NOSPAM.rogers.com.retro.com              On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:03:29 GMT, henry@spsystems.net (Henry Spencer)       wrote:              >There is no way that solid-core nuclear can do 100km/s. Even gas-core       >probably tops out around 50km/s. 100km/s or more should be feasible with       >systems that don't try to separate fission fuel and propellant -- NSWR or       >imploded-pellet fission, for example -- but operating costs will be high       >and the exhaust generally rather dirty.               This is rather old, and I doubt much research has gone into it...       but if it could be developed, it would be an *immense* improvement in       rocket technology...               From an article by Jerry Pournelle...               "Take Boron-11 (11B5). Bombard with protons. The result is a       complex reaction that ends with helium and no nuclear particles. It       could be a direct spacedrive. For those interested, the basic       equation is               11B5 + p = 3(4He2) + 16MeV               and 16 million electron volts gives pretty energetic helium. The       exhaust velocity is better than 10,000 kilometers/second, giving a       theoretical specific impulse of something over a million."              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca