From: zenadsl6186@zen.co.uk   
      
   Rick Jones wrote:   
      
   > Henry Spencer  wrote:   
   >> Considering that regular ozone is not used as an oxidizer because it   
   >> is a powerful and touchy explosive, I don't even want to *think*   
   >> about a version packing twice as much energy...   
   >   
   > A peanut gallery question - would it be more touchy than antimatter?   
      
   No, though close. "Antimatter" and "touchy", together, kinda spells B-O-O-M   
   better than anything else.   
      
   BTW, what's a peanut gallery question?   
      
   Anyway, what about cyclic O4? Should be far more stable, and cyclic O5   
   should be a little better, the bond angles are far more natural.   
      
   New allotropes are always fun. But not always real.   
      
      
   --   
   Peter Fairbrother   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)