Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,514 of 3,113    |
|    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=FCdiger_Klaehn?= to Peter Fairbrother    |
|    Re: Polythene tanks?    |
|    05 Feb 05 14:36:49    |
      From: klaehn@gamemakers.de              Peter Fairbrother schrieb:       > Rüdiger Klaehn wrote:              [snip]       >>You still have not answered why wings and wheels are the only safe       >>technology for landing. Even if we accept the very unrealistic       >>assumption that a space transport must be safe as commercial airliners,       >>there is no technical reason that you can not get very high safety with       >>rocket powered landing.       >       >       > First, I doubt that - what if a child runs out on the landing field?        >       That is a silly argument. That has nothing to do with the reliability of       the vehicle. I guess trains are too dangerous for the general public       too, since when a child runs on the tracks in front of a train it dies.               > what if       > you miss the field and are committed to landing in a built-up area? Powered       > wings and wheels avoid that situation.       >       A vertical landing rocketship can land on any flat area, as the DC-X       proved. And you won't land your rocketships in the middle of a city anyway.              > and second, who's doing safe controlled rocket powered landings right now?       >       So?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca