home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.space.tech      Technical and general issues related to      3,113 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,613 of 3,113   
   Ken Taylor to Andrew Gray   
   Re: Radiation-safe orbits   
   02 Mar 05 17:21:31   
   
   XPost: sci.space.science   
   From: ken@home.nz.retro.com   
      
   "Andrew Gray"  wrote in message   
   news:slrnd29bo4.7b6.andrew.gray@compsoc.dur.ac.uk...   
   > On 2005-02-28, Ken Taylor  wrote:   
   > > "Jim McCauley"  wrote in message   
   > > news:421ebc7e$0$42486$75868355@news.frii.net...   
   > >> I realize that all spacecraft require some degree of radiation   
   hardening,   
   > >> but within reasonable limits, what are the altitude ranges that might   
   be   
   > >> recommended for earth satellites for equatorial orbit? I understand   
   that   
   > >> there are two particularly intense belts of radiation; at what   
   altitudes   
   > >> might they best be avoided?   
   > >   
   > > Equatorial orbit (geosynchronous orbit) is *only* at (approx) 35,000km.   
   >   
   > Note that whilst geosynchronous orbits are equatorial, equatorial orbits   
   > do not have to be geosynchronous; you can quite happily have a satellite   
   > in LEO, just at an orbital inclination of zero degrees.   
   >   
   > --   
   > -Andrew Gray   
   >  andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk   
      
   Touché. Mental note - keep fingers off keyboard before second cuppa.   
      
   Ken   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca