Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,670 of 3,113    |
|    John Schilling to kitplane01@gmail.com    |
|    Re: Titanium in the Shuttle    |
|    22 Mar 05 22:20:26    |
      XPost: sci.space.shuttle       From: schillin@spock.usc.edu              kitplane01@gmail.com writes:              >I understand that the basic structure of the Shuttle is aluminum,       >rather like a Boeing 747. A titanium structure would weigh less.              Not that much less. Titanium alloys have only 30-40% better strength       to weight than aluminum alloys, and slightly *less* stiffness to weight.       Also higher density and more difficult fabrication, which complicate       structural design.                     >Further a titanium structured craft could have a less massive thermal       >protection system, since things like the wings and tail could be allowed       >more heat.              The temperature behind the bow shock of a space shuttle on re-entry is       vastly higher than either aluminum *or* titanium can handle. You're       still going to need the tiles, and you're not really going to be able       to shave that much weight off them. It's like suggesting that you       could make it easier for people to walk through a blast furnace if you       were able to tweak the natural body temperature up to 180 F.              Aluminum also has an edge in this respect in that, A: it has a very       high heat conductivity, and B: it has a moderately high heat capacity.       So any local overheating will be diffused throughout the structure and       absorbed, and you mostly just have to worry about the average. With       titanium, local overheating leads to local failure, and you have to get       your thermal protection system right *everywhere*.                     >NASA did study this option. Why did they pick aluminum?              Because it was almost as good, and a lot cheaper and easier to deal       with.                     --       *John Schilling * "Anything worth doing, *       *Member:AIAA,NRA,ACLU,SAS,LP * is worth doing for money" *       *Chief Scientist & General Partner * -13th Rule of Acquisition *       *White Elephant Research, LLC * "There is no substitute *       *schillin@spock.usc.edu * for success" *       *661-718-0955 or 661-275-6795 * -58th Rule of Acquisition *              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca