Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,756 of 3,113    |
|    Henry Spencer to "roland_lemmersANTea$PeM"@planet.nl    |
|    Re: Why Xenon?    |
|    25 Jun 05 02:40:24    |
      From: henry@spsystems.net              In article <42bc0db4$0$1592$ba620dc5@text.nova.planet.nl>,       Roland <"roland_lemmersANTea$PeM"@planet.nl> wrote:       >The header of the message pretty much says what my question is: Why is       >Xenon the propellant of choice for an ion thruster?       >What makes it a better choice than for instance nitrogen or oxygen?              As others have noted, you want a monoatomic material -- something that       will produce ions of only one mass, rather than a molecule that might       break up and might not -- and you want it heavy.              Easy ionization is also nice, although the ionization process in most ion       thrusters is grossly inefficient anyway and it probably doesn't make a big       difference.              Finally, for practical reasons, it should be something that is neither       corrosive nor poisonous. Cesium, often cited as a likely propellant back       before people actually tried to build ion thrusters, is both. Mercury was       used for some time, and has advantages, but it's quite poisonous, and as       safety standards were tightened, the cost of ground testing of mercury       thrusters became prohibitive.              Xenon is scarce and expensive, and the high-pressure tanks for storing it       are a bit heavy, but otherwise it's a pretty good choice. The only real       problem is that there simply isn't *enough* of it for really large-scale       space activity. Getting a ton of it should not be difficult, if you've       got the better part of a million bucks to spend. But you simply cannot       buy a thousand tons of it for delivery next year, no matter how much money       you have; the production capacity simply isn't there. You'd have to build       your own extraction plants -- big ones.       --       "Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer        -- George Herbert | henry@spsystems.net              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca