Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,760 of 3,113    |
|    Keith Harwood to iain-3@truecircuits.com    |
|    Re: Why Xenon?    |
|    30 Jun 05 12:30:41    |
      From: vitalmis@optusnet.com.au              iain-3@truecircuits.com wrote:              >       > 1. The problem with a molecule that might break up is... that a       > population       > with two very different charge/mass ratios will deliver worse       > overall       > Isp and thrust to power than a population with the same average       > charge/       > mass but a single ion species? An example:       > Thruster1: one ion species, 40 km/s exhaust velocity       > Thruster2: two ion species, 30 and 50 km/s exhaust velocity,       > half of each kind of species.       > If both thrusters flow 1g/s of propellant, both produce 40 newtons       > of       > thrust. At perfect efficiency, Thruster1 uses 800 kW, and Thruster2       > uses 850 kW. Clearly thruster1 is better.              I was under the impression that energy is used in breaking up molecules and       contributes nothing to the thrust.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca