Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,887 of 3,113    |
|    Patrick Schaaf to bob_jenkins@burtleburtle.net    |
|    Re: LOX/H2 jumbo jets?    |
|    15 Dec 05 06:28:19    |
      From: mailer-daemon@bof.de              bob_jenkins@burtleburtle.net writes:              >How come the commercial airlines use jet fuel rather than LOX/H2? I       >would have thought LOX/H2 would be lighter and would give the planes a       >longer range. Is petroleum just cheaper?              That may very very well be the case.              Maybe it has something to do with operating deep freezing equipment       near ordinary humans (passengers, various personell), and it has       something to do with the tendency of H2 to diffuse out of most       containers, over short time? And maybe it has something to do       with the fact that airlines tend to fly at constant speed over       their range, instead of explosively accellerating for the first       few minutes of flight?              best regards        Patrick              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca