Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,917 of 3,113    |
|    Rémy MERCIER to Mike Lorrey    |
|    Re: LOX/H2 jumbo jets?    |
|    22 Jan 06 11:40:00    |
      From: Rmy.MERCIER.221o9m@spacebanter.com              Mike Lorrey Wrote:       > Rémy MERCIER wrote:       > bob_jenkins@burtleburtle.net Wrote:       > How come the commercial airlines use jet fuel rather than LOX/H2? I       > would have thought LOX/H2 would be lighter and would give the planes       > a       > longer range. Is petroleum just cheaper?       >       > Gas instead of kerosene was studied in the 1990s. In the future we'll       > see very large planes (kerosene will desapear 100 years before gas).       > Imagine a A380 with the first level full with gas. To build A380 was       > an       > intelligent move.       >       > If its such an intelligent move, why is it seeing such terrible sales?       > The Dreamliner is kicking its butt all over the sky.              If you want to buy a A380 you have to wait until 2011... because of the       169 already sold... If you want to buy a A350 you have to wait until       2010... The dreamliner takes advantage of this gap... but until 2010...       and this is not a big advantage because of list prices...       169 A380 plus 170 A350 is roughly equal to 500 dreamliner...                     --       Rémy MERCIER              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca