Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,010 of 3,113    |
|    Rick Jones to derek_c@cix.compulink.co.uk    |
|    Re: Realistic space-to-space weapons for    |
|    05 Jun 06 17:13:57    |
      From: rick.jones2@hp.com              derek_c@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote:       > So the most ecologically sound way to attack an orbiting satellite       > would be to use a small unmanned tug to match orbits with it then       > deorbit it.              > The victim burns up in the Earth's atmosphere, along with all the       > evidence that you shot it down!              Unless of course the satelite being brought-down has the timerity to       either not burn-up completely, or perhaps act as a heat-shield for the       small unmanned tug that caused it to de-orbit :)              rick jones       --       oxymoron n, Hummer H2 with California Save Our Coasts and Oceans plates       these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :)       feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca