Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.space.tech    |    Technical and general issues related to    |    3,113 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,062 of 3,113    |
|    Paul F. Dietz to ianparker2@gmail.com    |
|    Re: Percentage of sun blocked by a space    |
|    31 Oct 06 07:26:26    |
      XPost: alt.astronomy, sci.environment, sci.space.policy       XPost: alt.global-warming       From: dietz@dls.net              ianparker2@gmail.com wrote:              > 1) Try to get mass down 55kg/kms. and use a completely recoverable 2STO       > with ion propulsion to L1 from LEO. This is doable.              One thing to point out is that you don't need mirrors,       you need devices that can diffract sunlight by a degree       (or so) so it misses the Earth. Small angle scattering       can be done with a sparse array of scattering elements,       so the mass could be much lower than a full mirror (even       a mirror with submicron holes). Something like a random       network of tangled carbon nanotubes, arranged between       think support elements, might do the trick.              You still have problems with CO2 acidifying the oceans,       and at high CO2 levels you get a change in the temperature       distribution even if global average temperature can       be controlled. Still, given the feckless response of       the world to calls to limit CO2 emissions I don't think       it would be responsible to retard a backup plan such       as this, if it had a real chance of working.               Paul              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca