On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 at 2:43:23 PM UTC-5, Poutnik wrote:   
   > >    
   > > Again, that would produce a delayed response.   
   > >    
   > That is speculative.   
   >    
      
   Of course it is, as I am betting on it.  I can also imagine far fetched   
   possibilities such as an epigenetic change that lasts multiple generations.    
   But, the most likely explanation is that 1-triacontanol has no positive effect   
   on plants at any    
   concentration and everything that says otherwise is the result of fraud or   
   delusion.   
      
   Incidentally, it is also alleged that 1-triacontanol causes plants to produce   
   L(+)-adenosine and the same results can be more reliably obtained by treating   
   plants with L(+)-adenosine. This was 20 years ago, so why isn't L(+)-adenosine   
   being marketed as a    
   PGR instead of 1-triacontanol? Because it's all a fraud.  I bet.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)