Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.chem    |    Chemistry and related sciences    |    55,615 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 54,031 of 55,615    |
|    Norm X to All    |
|    Re: the neutron, the nucleus, quarks, an    |
|    05 Mar 17 15:39:30    |
      XPost: sci.physics       From: someone@microsoft.com              > An isolated neutron will on average, in its own rest frame, decay into an       > electron and a proton in less than 15 minutes. The electron is an       > indivisible particle, while the proton is not.       >       > The nucleus of all atoms except hydrogen, is some kind of ensemble of       > protons and neutron, bound by the strong nuclear force. Isolated protons       > and neutrons are each identical particles. This may be true even if they       > are not isolated.       >       > According to the standard model, protons and neutron are each some kind of       > ensemble of quarks, bound by the strong nuclear force.       >       > Question: to what extent can we consider the nucleus an ensemble of quarks       > without recourse to the proton/neutron description of the nucleus?       >       > Thanks.              Supplementary question:              Which is better, the proton/neutron description or the quark soup model, for       prediction of observables, like the scattering diameter of a nucleus? On the       other hand, are any such observables, useful for refinement of the strong       nuclear force in the standard model?              Thanks again.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca