Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 01:48:10 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Page5, 1-5 Two largest errors most people have in thinking about a
Atom Totality. Atom-Totality-Universe/textbook 8th ed. 2017
From: Archimedes Plutonium
Injection-Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 09:48:10 +0000
Page5, 1-5 Two largest errors most people have in thinking about a Atom
Totality. Atom-Totality-Universe/textbook 8th ed. 2017
Alright, if you are guessing that the Cosmic Atom is the chemical element
plutonium, you are correct. I have not set up the reader for any surprises.
The chemical element that fits the Universe the best is plutonium and
especially the isotope of 231Pu.
Now before I talk of the evidence, both physics and math evidence, let me
backpedal a bit here for the reader and explain how all we see in the night
sky of stars, galaxies, planets and other objects are parts, and pieces of a
last electron=muon of a big
gigantic atom of 231Pu. Let me backpedal for all the times I encountered
people curious about the theory and what was troubling to them, so awfully
troubling that they could not accept the theory.
Imagine the electron=muon as a one solid ball that moves inside an atom, but
also, imagine a electron that is shattered to pieces into a large number of
dots as pieces of that shattered electron=muon and imagine those pieces placed
far apart in Space.
In as few of words as possible to describe this theory is my signature block
for many years of my posts to the Internet: The whole entire Universe is just
one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies.
If you look in a chemistry textbook of what an electron=muon looks like, it is
not a ball shaped object but a whole lot of little dots that form a cloud.
Physics and Chemistry call it the Electron-dot-cloud. So the Atom Totality
theory is basically the
idea that the dots of the electron-cloud are galaxies in the night sky, and
inside a dot are more dots such as dots for stars, dots for planets, and even
smaller dots for animals and plants and humans, until we get to the finest
dots of all-- atoms,
except the Atom Totality.
So as you look up in the night sky and see shiny white dots as galaxies and as
stars, those white dots are mass-pieces of the last six electrons=muons of
231Plutonium.
To describe the rival theory of the Big Bang theory would go like this:
The universe arose from a big explosion. That is the sum total to the Big Bang
theory. It is simplistic and does not have much information. It does not tell
us why it exploded and the Big Bang theory is not Quantum Mechanics.
The Atom Totality theory is all Quantum Mechanics for it posits that only
atoms, including the Universe itself, exist. And the Atom Totality theory is a
consistent theory since it posits that only atoms exist. All matter is
composed of atoms but science
is neglecting to complete the picture of logic by realizing that the whole
entire universe must also be an atom. Quantum Mechanics is atomic physics,
physics of the "small" the size of atoms.
The Big Bang theory places all of its information into an "explosion", and
the Universe is not an entity, a "whole thing" in the Big Bang but some
amorphous nonentity. The Big Bang is structureless. Whereas the Atom
Totality has all the richness of
atomic physics to lean on. We can talk about
size, about shape, about
structures such as a nucleus, and Cosmic protons and cosmic electrons=muons.
We can talk about a evolution or transformation of atoms, of going from
hydrogen to helium to lithium
and onwards and upwards to elements 90, 91,92,93,94, etc etc. With the Big
Bang we are left speechless and questionless, because there is nothing to
talk about other than some explosion allegedly happened.
Laypersons and nonscientists and even a large proportion of alleged scientists
have two major problems and errors with the Atom Totality theory and these two
errors are :
(1) They cannot envision how the universe we see is the inside of one
big
atom. And I get a lot of fools saying that there are only 94 galaxies because
of 94 electrons=muons, in plutonium. A lot of fools.
(2) They mistakenly think that since plutonium is radioactive that this
hinders the theory. They mistakenly think the Plutonium Atom Totality will
decay away and -out-goes-the-Universe. Here one minute and gone the next, type
of mistake.
So how do I answer those two most recurring errors that both laypersons and
even most trained scientists make as listed in (1) and (2) above?
I answer them by saying look at a chemistry textbook of the electron-
dot-cloud of atoms. Their mistake is that they think the electron is a single
ball that goes moving around the nucleus of an atom. It maybe a ball when the
atom is collapsed
wavefunction such as the moving of electricity in a wire. But an atom that is
Uncollapsed wavefunction has its electrons=muons as dot-clouds. The
electron=muon is a large cloud around the nucleus of the atom and is a huge
number of dots. Each one of
those dots is a tiny hunk or piece of the electron=muon. So that if all the
dots were put together then the electron=muon would be
a ball. So now we
begin to understand how a plutonium atom of its electrons=muons is the
galaxies of the night sky. That
each galaxy we see in the night sky is a tiny piece of an electron=muon of the
Atom Totality.
If you examine a chemistry textbook of the 5f6 or the s, or the p or the d or
the f orbital of a electron=muon you will see a electron-dot-cloud. That the
electron is not a ball but those huge number of dots. If we carry that idea
all the way to its
end-limit, each atom in the Cosmos is a dot, except for the Cosmic atom
itself. Remember the Born Interpretation, each dot was a probability of
finding the electron=muon as a ball at that position in the atom. But in the
Atom Totality interpretation,
each dot is a small tiny atom inside the Atom Totality.
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
