MIT looking really stupid in physics and chemistry-- Ion Lesson Re: Drs.L.   
   Reif, George Clark, Irwin Pless of MIT teach percentages correctly??--   
   Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV =   
   Dirac's monopole   
      
   Look at how silly, utterly silly the professors of MIT physics look when they   
   teach that ions, or oxidation is the removal or gain of electrons-- utter   
   pathethic nonsense to think a atom of IRON can lose up to 7 electrons and   
   still be an atom of iron.    
      
   That is almost like saying a animal can lose 7 organs and still be an animal.   
   Such nonsense. And goes to show, that not only in common day life, the smarter   
   we think we are, actually, focuses on how really stupid we are.    
      
      
   Lesson on IONS in New Physics Re:/never realizing the Real Electron = muon,   
   proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole    
      
      
   Brief course on IONS in New Physics, for all of Physics and Chemistry are   
   changed with the revelation that the REAL ELECTRON is the muon particle and   
   REAL PROTON is 840 MeV.    
      
   So, this pretty much changes everthing in chemistry, everything    
      
   Ion states    
   oxidation states Fe -2 to +7 although +2, +3 most common    
      
   Now, Fe+2 means the iron atom has 2 magnetic monopoles of + charge present    
      
   The Fe-2 ion of iron means it has 2 magnetic monopoles of - charge present    
      
   The hydrogen atom has ions of -1 to +1, H+1 means it has 1 proton of 840MeV, 1   
   electron of 105 MeV, and one magnetic monopole of +1 charge of .5MeV    
      
   H-1 means a hydrogen atom as ion has 1 proton of 840 MeV, 1 electron of 105   
   MeV and one magnetic monopole of -1 charge of .5MeV    
      
   Oxygen has oxidation states (ion states) of +2, +1, -1, -2.    
      
   O+2 means oxygen with 8 protons each of 840 MeV, 8 electrons each of 105 MeV,   
   and 2 magnetic monopoles each of +1 electric charge of .5MeV    
      
      
   So, as I was saying so much before, how silly and stupid physicist were to   
   think for a single moment, that you take loads and loads of classroom time   
   studying momentum, and at the end of it all, you think the atom is a electron   
   of .5MeV while proton is    
   938 MeV and you expect chemical bonding to occur under those circumstances. If   
   you had a marble as the electron and a bowling ball as the proton, how in   
   heaven's name are you so deranged in thinking that the momentum of the marble   
   and bowling ball is    
   going to form chemical bonds?    
      
   But the flip side of that ignorance is ION theory. To think for one moment,   
   that iron atom can lose 7 electrons, yes, mind you, 7 whole electrons and you   
   got to be a crazy idiot of a chemist to think that you still have an iron   
   atom. A logical person, a    
   logical chemist, would say, Fe+7 is a iron atom that has 26 protons each   
   840MeV and 26 electrons each 105 MeV and what the +7 is, is 7 magnetic   
   monopoles each of +1 charge at .5MeV apiece.    
      
   So, the failure of Physics and Chemistry in the past 100 years, was a failure   
   to recognize what physics is mostly about-- momentum, and that a marble to a   
   bowling ball is not going to be a hydrogen atom. A bowling ball with a 1/8   
   bowling ball, is going    
   to be an atom. And that if you have an atom, it is not going to give up any of   
   its protons or electrons easily, which means the unbalanced charges-- ions of   
   atoms, is not a loss or gain of electrons, for the electrons rarely get out of   
   any atom. But    
   rather the unbalanced charges is due to a particle that Dirac chased after all   
   of his life-- the Magnetic Monopole.    
      
   And everytime a atom is unbalanced in charge, is due to a buildup of monopoles   
   on that atom.    
      
   AP   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)