Working through the anomalies of AufBau of Chemistry, 20 of 94 elements out of   
   whack   
      
   Alright, I discovered the Real Electron = 105 MeV, Real Proton = 840 MeV, and   
   the little particle .5 MeV was Dirac's magnetic monopole, that is either + or   
   - charge energy, not rest mass energy of .5MeV. Now that discovery has to make   
   a huge change in    
   the AufBau, and that change is a welcome relief, because if you have a   
   principle that works well on only 74 out of 94 elements, in science business,   
   that means you really have no principle and there is only two remedies I can   
   think of to correct the    
   AufBau.    
      
   Remedies:    
   (1) The principle is correct if we add another minor principle, in other   
   words, we do not have the full principle so that the building of atoms of the   
   periodic table is correct 94 out of 94 elements.    
      
   (2) We throw out the Aufbau altogether and start anew.    
      
   Now, I am up to my neck gills in work for 2018 doing the textbook Teaching   
   True Mathematics, and have no time running down this principle. But, I have   
   time to make a few scattered posts on the subject, for by doing such, I am   
   training my mind throughout    
   2018 to subconsciously think about how to correct the Aufbau.    
      
   I definitely plan to return in 2019 to write the next edition of Atom   
   Totality, and one of the cornerstone additions is a improved Aufbau.    
      
   What is my gut instinct? Sad to say, I think we need to throw Aufbau   
   completely out and start afresh. I say this because my discovery of Real   
   Electron = 105 MeV is that I noticed the table of elementary physics   
   particles, the table shows proton 938 and    
   neutron 940 MeV and shows muon at 105 MeV. Now most people looking at those   
   numbers can never see a connection, never. But, in 2016 I wrote posts saying,   
   those numbers are too close together that a proton = 9 times muon, with only a   
   less than 1%, a .7%    
   not even 1% difference. That is what started the avalanche of discovery, that   
   the Muon had to be the Real Electron.    
      
   But it was not until 2017 that I fully appreciated what I had discovered in   
   2016, that my mind had not yet comprehended that huge vast change the   
   discovery would cause. It meant that the proton itself could not be 938 MeV   
   but had to be 840 MeV and the    
   neutron was 945 MeV. So a 1 year lapse in my mind to fully soak in, what that   
   monumental discovery would mean to chemistry and physics.    
      
   But the gift that gave in 2016 and 2017 has still far more to give-- in terms   
   of the Aufbau, and the problems of the Aufbau.    
      
   Science is never science when 20 out of 94 are in error. So, my instinct tells   
   me to throw out the Aufbau altogether. Why?    
      
   Because if you notice, that the Real Proton is equal to 8 Real Electrons. So   
   the proton itself is a Building Project made up of 8 Real Electrons, a sort of   
   aufbau of the proton itself. That means the Aufbau with a error of 20 out of   
   94 is not the real    
   science, but something else.    
      
   And chemistry has a famous rule called the Octet rule. Octet means 8.    
      
   So, I am in favor at this time of throwing out the Aufbau altogether.    
      
   Question, was the Aufbau principle ever in talks with the Maxwell Equations? I   
   mean, when formulating the Aufbau, was there ever injections of Maxwell   
   theory? I believe zero cross pollination.    
      
   So, if the Proton is built from a octet of 8 electrons, then the octet 8, must   
   be the atomic closed loop wire of Faraday's law for atomic nuclei. In other   
   words, the subatomic particles follow the Maxwell theory, yet the Aufbau never   
   followed Maxwell    
   theory-- I mean they never ran discord, but, they never were enriched by any   
   Maxwell theory.    
      
   So, I post this because, well, by posting I know how much of my mind works-- a   
   lot of it subconscious, sleeping and running the gamut without me consciously   
   aware of its hidden searches. So a full year away from physics and running on   
   subconscious    
   subpilot mode, I have the suspicion, no guarantee, that by 2019, I will have--   
   Building of Elements that is 94 out of 94, not our present 74 out of 94.    
      
   AP   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)