Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.chem    |    Chemistry and related sciences    |    55,615 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 54,312 of 55,615    |
|    plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com to Archimedes Plutonium    |
|    Re: Working through the anomalies of Auf    |
|    28 Jan 18 13:49:51    |
      On Sunday, January 28, 2018 at 5:08:28 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:       > On Sunday, January 28, 2018 at 4:51:34 AM UTC-6, plutonium....@gmail.com       wrote:       > > Some reminders:: the math of aufbau is a snake like math       > > / / /       > > / / /       > > / /       > > /       >               No need to wait a year, I do believe I already have the Aufbau. Good news is       that we keep it all, in its entirety. The only change is that we recognize the       s orbital is special, in that it is dynamic not static, and the filling of       shells is exactly what        the Aufbau says it is                     7s              6s 6p 6d 6f 6g 6h              5s 5p 5d 5f 5g              4s 4p 4d 4f               3s 3p 3d        \       2s 2p        \ \       1s        \              Electron=muon filling follows that exactly, the aufbau is obeyed 100%              What needs changing is our perception that the orbitals in the "s" are       dynamic, moving, not fixed, whereas in the other orbitals, they are fixed       except at the s interface.              This means a whole lot of new experiments to verify              What caused the Chemistry Anomalies was simply the ignoring the idea that       Faraday's law needed to be obeyed and in that law, one item is fixed-- either       the closed loop copper wire or the magnet, and one item is moving-- either the       bar magnet or the        closed loop wire (coil).              So the filling of atoms by electrons needs this Faraday law, and it is       achieved mostly by the "s" orbital as the moving bar magnet. Two electrons       have a difficult time of forming a closed loop wire, hence, they become the       bar magnet. They actually do        fill the "s" orbital first just as the Aufbau says              Only trouble occurs when scientists go and measure for the filling, and when       they set up their experiments, instead of capturing evidence that the silver       atom is 5s2 4d9 or the copper is 4s2 3d9 is that the experimental set up       captures the electron that        is in motion in the wrong place.              Now this wrong place and right place in the Aufbau, is that the Aufbau is       fully correct, the filling actually follows aufbau 100%, but what causes       grief, is the idea that the s orbital is not fixed but in motion.              You see, atoms internally need to form either a bar magnet which the s is all       about, or forming a closed loop wire which the p, d, f are equipped to do. The       p is 6 electrons so that forms easily a closed loop wire of a hexagon, but       better yet 6 +2 is a        octagon closed loop wire. So that the 2 s electrons need to be a bar magnet,       but have that competing interest to form a 8 closed loop wire.              So that brings us to the discussion of hydrogen and helium, for all atoms need       a Bar Magnet and the s serves it, but, all atoms need a closed loop wire for       the bar magnet. What is the closed loop wire for hydrogen and helium? It is       the protons serving as        the closed loop wire and the need of neutrons.              Here, for the first time in chemistry we require neutrons. Not because protons       repel one another, for protons love one another and desire to be together,       they attract. So why ever need neutrons? Atoms need neutrons not to neutralize       protons versus        protons, no, that is not the game at all, the reason atoms need neutrons is to       form a closed loop wire in the nucleus.              Remember in EM theory there is only attraction in the Coulomb force, and there       is denial of same space occupancy. There is no repulsion in EM theory. So that       being said, why not have all protons and no neutrons in atom nuclei? The       answer is simple,        neutrons form the closed loop wire with protons.              So in Helium we have 2neutrons and 2 protons. But, the neutron = 1 proton + 1       electron=muon. So for helium nuclei we have 4 protons of 840MeV each, and we       have 2 electrons of 105 MeV each, making a total of 6 particles to form the       Helium nucleus. Now,        remember that muon times 8 equals a proton. So, in helium nucleus, altogether       we have 4X8= 24 muons plus 2 muons = 26 particles inside the helium nucleus to       form a closed loop wire for Faraday's law. The Helium Nucleus is the iron atom       protons. And we        all know that iron Fe26 is stable to both fusion and fission.              So, the Helium nucleus is 26 particles, all of them muonelectrons serving as       Faraday's closed loop wire coil with two electrons in the 1s serving as the       bar magnet of Faraday's law.              So in this manner, what we see is every atom obeys the AUFBAU, but, when we       set up experiments to locate where the last two electrons are located, our       experiments bias our conclusion. We think the silver atom is 4d10 5s1 but it       really is 4d9 5s2. It is        just unfortunate that we caught on film or tape where the electron in the 5s       was moving back and forth to 4d that it was thought, the electron was a fixed       permanent resident of 4d when in truth it was 5s resident.              AP              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca