From: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 17:17:20 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Page7, 1-7 Dirac's "new-radioactivities" which grows and creates our
Solar System and Cosmos/ Atom-Totality-Universe/ textbook 8th ed. 2017
From: Archimedes Plutonium
Injection-Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 01:17:21 +0000
Page7, 1-7 Dirac's "new-radioactivities" which grows and creates our Solar
System and Cosmos/ Atom-Totality-Universe/ textbook 8th ed. 2017
Now I went to see how many times Dirac even mentions Big Bang theory in his
book Directions in Physics, to sort of gauge whether Dirac was lukewarm about
the Big Bang or whether he was disgusted with the Big Bang. Perhaps a accurate
historian can fill in
some details, for I perceive Dirac as somewhat hostile towards the Big Bang,
although I have no direct evidence of that.
In Dirac's book "Directions in Physics" 1978 he mentions the Big Bang but not
a connotation of approval but only in a tone where Dirac needs to say what the
present day physics community beliefs are, as a backdrop to his deriving his
"new radioactivities"
. Dirac later goes on to say that his new-radioactivities is a contradiction
to present day physics, or, above and beyond the establishment view of
physics.
In my book, Atom Totality Theory, Dirac has large coverage with
ew-radioactivities as to how the Solar System and the Cosmos at large were
formed. Dirac's new-radioactivities destroys the Nebular Dust Cloud theory and
also the Big Bang itself.
So maybe, early on in this book, I should mention the fact that Archimedes
Plutonium is a continuation of the best of physicists that came before, Paul
Dirac and John Bell. That the Atom Totality theory is not a clear out of the
blue theory, but a
continuation of the brightest of all physicists in the 20th century-- Dirac.
The three giants of 20th century physics if we include Debroglie, for which
our present day blind physics community does not yet perceive,-- were
Debroglie, Dirac and Bell. So the reader should not think that
Archimedes
Plutonium discovered and built
the Atom Totality theory in a vacuum but rather, this theory is a further
continuation of what DeBroglie discovered of the thermodynamics of a isolated
atom and what Dirac discovered as to how radioactivity builds a Cosmos and the
Dirac Sea of positrons
forming Space, and what Bell came to conclude in the concept of
uperdeterminism.
If one were to evaluate the feeling of Dirac towards the Big Bang theory, my
impression from "Directions in Physics" is that he was not in acceptance of
the Big Bang, because you cannot have favored new- radioactivities and still
cling on to the Big Bang
theory.
This chapter is how the Solar System came to be and grew and more important,
how the Universe grew from a Hydrogen Atom Totality all the way up to its
present 231Plutonium Atom Totality, and how it will eventually transform into
a Element 96 Atom
Totality in the future.
New-Radioactivities is found in the book "Directions in Physics", P. Dirac,
1978, pages 74 to 81 where he talks about "new radioactivities." If you do not
own the book, it is the best single book written on physics of the 20th
century and Dirac was the
singular most important physicist of the 20th century for it was Dirac that
sealed Quantum Mechanics with the Dirac Equation and then it was Dirac who
lead the way to the Atom Totality theory via new-radioactivities and Space as
positron space. A lot of
people think Bohr was the greatest physicist of the 20th century, but in fact,
it was Dirac that surpassed him in leading the way to the 21st century. Bohr's
quantum mechanics does not directly lead into an Atom Totality, but Dirac's
new-radioactivities
does lead into a Atom Totality.
Note: here I must interject, by saying since the discovery that the Real
Electron is the muon at 105 MeV, and that the particle of .5MeV is not an
electron at all but is rather a photon or neutrino with a energy in charge of
.5MeV. It is not rest mass
energy .5 but is charge-energy of .5 MeV and this particle I call a monopole
or magnepole and so it can be either +1 charge .5 MeV or -1 charge .5 MeV. So
that the Dirac positron sea as Space takes on a whole different meaning. That
if all Matter in the
observable universe is the matter of the last electrons in 231Pu Atom
Totality, then we have to wonder how can matter be charged matter when we
observe it as neutral matter for the most part? Well, if the .5 MeV is a
photon or neutrino with either a +1
or -1 MeV, then we can see that if Matter is -1 charge, and Space were +1
charge, then we can accept our Observable Universe is Neutral charge overall.
In "Directions in Physics", P. Dirac, 1978, pages 74 to 81 where he talks
about "new radioactivities." Specifically on page 77 is where Dirac outlines
his *new- radioactivity*. Funny how the entire physics and astronomy community
overlooked and never
realized the importance of these paragraphs in what is one of the most
important physics books ever written--
Dirac's Directions in Physics. It is
easy to teach anyone physics of facts; to teach them the Maxwell Equations or
Quantum Mechanics. But how
do you teach someone to recognize what subjects of physics are important and
what are "dead ends". The physics community chose dead-ends when it chose
Einstein and his General Relativity gravity, and chose to think subatomic
particles-- quarks and other
exotica were more important than atoms from which they all come from. Yet
there it is-- the brilliant truth of the 20th century in Dirac's few
paragraphs:
--- quoting Dirac's Directions in Physics, page 77 ---
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
