From: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com   
      
   Newsgroups: sci.math   
   Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 21:28:24 -0800 (PST)   
      
   Subject: Page8, 1-8 How crazy is the Standard Model of current day   
    physics//What specific chemical element is the Atom Totality? text 8th ed.   
   2017   
   From: Archimedes Plutonium    
   Injection-Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 05:28:24 +0000   
      
      
   Page8, 1-8 How crazy is the Standard Model of current day physics//What   
   specific chemical element is the Atom Totality? text 8th ed. 2017   
      
   It is so crazy, for they elevate quarks above atoms, and elevate quarks above   
   electrons=muons and protons. This is so so very dumb in terms of Logic and   
   logical reasoning. It is like doing Biology and not satisfied with the cell,   
   and thus taking parts of    
   the cell and thinking they are more fundamental than the cell itself.    
      
   This is the trouble in any science, not just physics, where in physics, people   
   are no longer physicists, but clowns of physics, where they spend all their   
   time in Ivory towers sipping coffee and eating Danish rolls, and not, and   
   never applying logic to    
   their ideas.    
      
   What is the basic primary unit of all of physics-- the Atom, nothing is   
   smaller as a primary unit.   
      
   What is the basic unit of electricity and magnetism? The Magnetic field and   
   its monopole the -1 and +1 particle of the .5 MeV charge-energy where you take   
   a photon or neutrino and place upon that photon or neutrino a charge with   
   energy of .5 MeV.   
      
   When it comes to physics, the atom is the last stop. When it comes to   
   electromagnetism, the Magnetic Field and the magnetic monopole (magnepole) is   
   the last stop.   
      
   Atoms, surely have parts, but we, with a head of logic of commonsense do not   
   then make a model where the parts are more important than the body itself--   
   Atom.    
      
   Likewise, when we have a logical mind and commonsense mind, we do not go out   
   and look for a stupid particle of Higgs, some creation from a machine that   
   concentrates energy, and idiots of physics believing in this insipid activity   
   of looking at collisions    
   in a collider, this is social welfare trough science, not real actual science.    
      
   Atoms are the last and final frontier of physics. Atoms are all and   
   everything. And only idiots of physics waste time in Standard Model or Higgs   
   or Quarks or anything less than atoms.    
      
   We can easily compare the idiots of Higgs or Quarks to someone in biology   
   wanting to make a strand of DNA as some major important item, when it is not.   
   DNA is nothing, without the cell it comes from. Biology starts and ends with   
   Cell. Physics starts and    
   ends with Atom. Not subcellular and not subatomic particles.    
      
   So, if you are in physics and spending a lot of time with Standard Model,   
   Quarks, Higgs, Gravity Waves etc you are wasting your lifetime.    
      
   It should be no secret to the reader what the chemical element is that is the   
   Atom Totality Universe, considering the title of this textbook. But let me   
   outline the Proof of why plutonium and not say iron or lead or mercury or   
   uranium or some other    
   chemical element. Why Plutonium? Why not Iron or Silver or Lead, or Mercury or   
   Uranium as the Cosmic Element? Why plutonium?    
      
   Well, whatever chemical element is the Cosmic single big atom, it must explain   
   pi, "e" in math and explain the fine-structure-constant and neutron to   
   magnepole mass ratio. It must explain all four of those items clearly and   
   linked together as one    
   explanation.    
      
   Now any reader can read my previous editions of this book where I go into   
   depth and detail of these 4 items. In some previous editions I wrote a chapter   
   on these, whereas in this edition I just summarize in one page, of these 4   
   items:    
      
   1) pi explained    
   2) "e" explained    
   3) fine-structure-constant explained    
   4) neutron/monopole mass ratio    
      
   Pi = 3.14.. and e = 2.71.. in math are the two most important constants of   
   math and there has to be a reason or explanation for what number values they   
   have. If we lived in say a Neon Atom Totality, the numbers of math for ratio   
   of circumference divided    
   by diameter of a circle would be different than 3.14...    
      
   In Plutonium chemical element there are 22 subshells of s, p, d, f inside of 7   
   shells, so we have 22/7. Now greenhorns of math and physics are going to crow   
   and bark about 22/7 because that is a rational number, and I know that,   
   (please see the    
   mathematics chapter where it is explained that irrationals numbers do not   
   exist), but in physics, you have Collapsed wavefunction as rational number   
   such as 22/7 and you have uncollapsed wavefunction which is a wave. This makes   
   sense in the fact that the    
   Cosmos is growing all the time and so a cosmic number of pi would be   
   uncollapsed.    
      
   Now "e" is about 2.71.. is easy to explain but has to be linked with pi. And   
   in plutonium, at any instant in time, only 19 subshells are occupied so we   
   have 19/7. And, of course we have both collapsed and uncollapsed   
   wavefunctions.    
      
   Now, the Inverse Fine-Structure Constant, roughly 137 is ((22/7)^7)/22 when   
   pi is in the collapsed wavefunction of pi = 22/7. So the reader should see by   
   now that all these important numbers have to be linked together.    
      
   The neutron to magnetic monopole mass ratio becomes linked with the above   
   numbers.    
   Dirac's book DIRECTIONS IN PHYSICS states on page 73 :    
   --- start of Dirac quote ---    
   One of these dimensionless constants is the 
 famous reciprocal of the   
   fine-structure constant ((hbar) x c)/E^2 
 It is fundamental in the atomic   
   theory, and it has the 
 value of about 137. 
 Another dimensionless   
   constant is the ratio of    
   the 
mass of the proton to the 
mass of the electron, that is to say,   
   
Mp/Me 
 That constant has the value somewhere near 1840.    
   --- end of Dirac quote ---    
      
   From earlier editions of this textbook, I wrote:    
      
   >The unitless number of proton to electron mass ratio has an exponent power of   
   5 in 6(pi^5), and that the exp >5 comes from the 5f6 of plutonium 231Pu. Now,   
   notice the inverse fine-structure constant of ((22/7)^7)/22 >also has the   
   energy shell of 7 as    
   exponent. Here for the first time in physics is a linkage of two unitless   
   >numbers of physics-- proton to electron mass ratio and the fine-structure   
   constant, by the fact that energy >level of shells correlates and predicts   
   what the exponent of a    
   unitless number must have. Why does the >energy shell take on a math form of   
   exponent? Perhaps an expert quantum chemist or physicist can provide >an   
   answer.    
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)