home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.chem      Chemistry and related sciences      55,615 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 54,349 of 55,615   
   Archimedes Plutonium to All   
   _True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Exper   
   21 Mar 18 22:07:16   
   
   From: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com   
      
   True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real   
   Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV   
      
   History Preface::   
      
      
   On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 4:12:07 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote in   
   sci.physics:   
   A history Preface to this textbook Re: TRUE CHEMISTRY, textbook, 2018   
      
   Now this book needs a Preface, to sort of tell people what it was like in the   
   time period of 1897 when JJ Thomson discovered a .5MeV particle and then going   
   on to believe he discovered the "electron of atoms", when in fact, what he   
   discovered was the    
   Magnetic Monopole of atoms. Yet the entire Scientific Community, whether   
   physics, chemistry, biology, all were duped into thinking this .5MeV particle   
   was the integral electron of atoms. So from 1897 until 2017 when I discovered   
   the Real Electron = muon =   
    105 MeV, that community of scientists all fell duped to thinking electron= .5   
   MeV.    
      
   Of course, that changes all of electricity, as we understood it in 1897   
   through 2017. So some time in the future, few people will understand what took   
   place from 1897 through 2017, when all scientists thought the atom was a   
   proton at 938MeV, neutron    
   940MeV and electron at .5MeV. Of course, my very first proof of the Real   
   Electron is 105 MeV was instantaneous to my mind--chemical bonding, chemical   
   bonding-- is it possible to have covalent bonding with 938 to .5 ??  For if   
   the Real Electron is 105    
   MeV then the Real Proton cannot be 938, but had to be 840MeV, and then,   
   chemical bonding covalent of 105 versus 840, all makes sense.    
      
   This entire discovery was caused by a noting in 2016, that it takes 9 muons to   
   make a proton (plus or minus less than 1%) To me, in science, I know all   
   physics has outside "noise" and so when you say plus or minus less than 1%,   
   means to me, anyway, that    
   9 muons = 1 proton. Now, sorry, but it took me another year from 2016 to 2017,   
   to say-- Real Proton = 840 MeV. Sadly, to discover that 9 muons = 1 proton in   
   2016, took another year in 2017 to subtract 105 from 945 to see that the Real   
   Proton was 840MeV.    
      
   And the instantaneous proof that came to my mind, is, well, you just cannot   
   have Chemistry, the Chemical bond of covalent, if the electron is .5MeV and   
   the proton 938MeV, for the angular-momentum is just not there to make covalent   
   bonding. If the Real    
   Electron is 105MeV and Real Proton is 840MeV then you have sufficient numbers   
   of MeV for angular momentum to create covalent bonding in atoms.    
      
   But let me in this preface tell the story of how Electricity was imagined to   
   be from 1897 to 2017. Electricity with the electron assumed as .5 MeV and   
   proton at 938 MeV, that electricity in this view was seen as a electron   
   particle that is wishy washy,    
   here now, gone a second later flowing in a wire as electricity. In the new   
   true view of electricity, electron = 105 MeV, proton = 840 MeV, it is rare for   
   that electron of hydrogen atoms to ever leave its proton, and what electricity   
   is-- is this monopole    
   particle that assumes either a +1 or -1 charge and is fickle, for it can be   
   attached to a hydrogen atom and with little to no encouragement, go flying off   
   along a copper wire. Only, flying is a metaphor, for the Monopole is a photon   
   or a neutrino dressed    
   up (superposition) with .5MeV charge energy. So the monopole is a wave, a   
   closed loop wave that becomes the shape of the closed loop wire itself. At the   
   moment, I am rebuilding a crystal radio set I had as a Xmas gift from my   
   father way back in about    
   1968. You see, the radio wave is a magnetic monopole, it is not an electron   
   out of some atom.    
      
   I need to build this Preface into a good logical history expose of how feeble   
   was the understanding and teaching of What the Real Electron was in science   
   from 1897 to 2017.    
      
   How utterly feeble it is, to have millions of students around the world   
   sitting in classes, hearing the teacher, the instructor saying that the   
   electron is a .5MeV particle that runs along copper wires and yields   
   electricity.    
      
   When the real truth is, that electrons are very heavy particles of 105 MeV,   
   1/8 the mass of the proton at 840 MeV, and it is rare, extremely rare that   
   this massive Real Electron ever leaves its proton, but that these magnetic   
   monopoles flit around, flit    
   here, flit there, flit almost everywhere, and these monopoles are electricity.    
      
   AP    
      
   Newsgroups: sci.math   
   Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 13:32:28 -0800 (PST)   
      
   Subject: Chemists are smarter than Physicists-- 2018 textbook of Experiment--   
    Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole =   
   .5MeV   
   From: Archimedes Plutonium    
   Injection-Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 21:32:28 +0000   
      
   Proofs that the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV, and that the .5MeV   
   particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole, after all   
      
   Experimental PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon    
   by Archimedes Plutonium   
      
   PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon    
      
   1st proof is chemical bonding cannot exist with momentum of 938 versus .5MeV    
   Chemical Bonds are covalent, ionic, metallic. You simply cannot get atoms to   
   bond if the electron is thought of as the .5MeV particle, only with a muon at   
   105 MeV and the proton at 840 MeV with neutron at 945 MeV do you have the   
   physics of angular    
   momentum that allows bonding in Chemistry. The .5MeV particle was, all along a   
   magnetic monopole of a photon with .5 MeV charge energy, not rest mass energy.    
      
   Newsgroups: sci.physics   
   Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:28:06 -0700 (PDT)   
      
   Subject: short history of subatomic particles of Physics Re: True Chemistry--   
    2018 textbook   
   From: Archimedes Plutonium    
   Injection-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 01:28:07 +0000   
      
   short history of subatomic particles of Physics Re: True Chemistry-- 2018   
   textbook   
      
   In my textbook True Chemistry, those new early pages, I need a chronology of   
   history of how we viewed atoms, their constituent elementary particles, and   
   electricity. For the blame as to not knowing the .5MeV particle was not the   
   electron but a magnetic    
   monopole, is the conceit of the minds of physicists, or should be say the   
   naivety of the minds of physicists is that they were blown away by +1 and -1   
   charge. If we had taken off the table the electric charge. Then when JJ   
   Thomson discovered this 1897    
   particle of .5MeV, if electric charge was not a issue, then Thomson, in my   
   opinion would have realized it could not be the electron.    
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca