From: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
#2page
#2page
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 23:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron =
105MeV, Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV
From: Archimedes Plutonium
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 06:00:28 +0000
Now here is a new proof that belongs in the first page.
Now chemistry is all about the nature and behaviour of the last electrons of
atoms, while the protons and neutrons of atoms play little role in chemistry.
So well if that malarkey is true then the electrons flowing in copper should
turn copper wire into
nickel wire. Should turn iron atoms into manganese.
And why is it not doing such? Because the .5MeV particle is not the electron
but a magnetic monopole and the real-electron = muon of atoms stays firmly in
place with Real Proton=84MeV.
In New Chemistry atomic number is the same if you count Real Electron =105MeV
or count protons.
AP
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: definition of Chemistry is all wet behind the ears in Old Chemistry
Re: True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV,
Real Proton = 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV
From: Archimedes Plutonium
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:44:41 +0000
definition of Chemistry is all wet behind the ears in Old Chemistry Re: True
Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton
= 840MeV, Dirac's magnetic monopole = .5MeV
- hide quoted text -
On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 1:00:31 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Now here is a new proof that belongs in the first page.
>
> Now chemistry is all about the nature and behavour of the last electrons of
atoms, while the protons and neutrons of atoms play little role in chemistry.
So well if that malarkey is true then the electrons flowing in copper should
turn copper wire into
nickel wire. Should turn iron atoms into manganese.
>
> And why is it not doing such? Because the .5MeV particle is not the electron
but a magnetic monopole and the real-electron = muon of atoms stays firmly in
place with Real Proton=84MeV.
>
> In New Chemistry atomic number is the same if you count Real Electron
=105MeV or count protons.
>
Alright, when I went to college in 1968, Univ Cincinnati, taking Freshman
Chemistry (may have been sophomore year?) one of the first things we learned
from the instructor is that Chemistry is about the electrons, the last few
electrons of any atom. I
remember the book used was Mortimer's Chemistry: A Conceptual Approach. I no
longer have the textbook edition I used, but a later edition, the 4th ed. of
Mortimer, 1979.
Now, Mortimer attempts to define Chemistry on page 1 by saying : "Chemistry
may be defined as the science that is concerned with the characterization,
composition, and transformation of matter. This definition, however, is far
from adequate." Further on,
Mortimer writes: "The focus of chemistry, however, is probably the chemical
reaction." Trouble is, though Mortimer never defines or tells us what
"chemical reaction" is. And probably the reason the UC instructor said words
to the effect-- "Chemistry is
about the behavior of the last electrons of atoms."
And so, what we have here, in terms of Logic, we have a massive contradiction,
a massive counterintuitive definition of Chemistry. So if the science of
Chemistry is basically, not all but the bulwark of chemistry is the study of
the last electrons in any
atom, then in electricity flow in copper, with Old Chemistries stupid notion
the electron is the .5MeV particle, then, right before your very eyes, all
copper wire should turn to nickel wire because is the nickel atom has 28
electrons and the copper has
29 electrons, as the electron flows into the appliance, it deprives all the
copper atoms of an electron and thus, making those copper atoms become nickel
atoms, even though they still have 29 protons.
You see, the only way to resolve Old Chemistry's dilemma, is to consider, that
the .5MeV particle was never the electron at all, but was Dirac's Magnetic
Monopole that Dirac strived to find in his lifetime for the monopole was the
carrier of electricity.
Electricity is not the flow of electrons, but the flow of magnetic monopoles--
those, .5MeV particles.
The Real Electron, like the Real Proton hardly ever move outside the atom they
are confined in. It takes enormous amount of energy to move any electron
inside an atom and that is because the Real Electron is 105MeV, what is called
the muon in physics,
and the Real Proton is 840MeV.
So, Old Chemistry-- every book that assumes the electron is .5MeV is now a
defunct worthless trash book. Old Chemistry starts off their science with a
crazy contradiction, a counterintuitive definition of Chemistry-- for they
say-- Chemistry is about the
last electrons of atoms, yet their ideas would thus cause copper wire to
change into nickel wire by just the flow of electricity. When the Real
Electron = muon, it stays behind with its 840MeV proton, securely fastened to
the proton, and what is flowing
as electricity is a .5 MeV magnetic monopole.
AP
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: new early page of textbook, explaining the hole in Old Chemistry Re:
True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook
From: Archimedes Plutonium
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 21:32:04 +0000
new early page of textbook, explaining the hole in Old Chemistry Re: True
Chemistry-- 2018 textbook
- hide quoted text -
On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 2:44:48 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 1:00:31 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Now here is a new proof that belongs in the first page.
> >
> > Now chemistry is all about the nature and behaviour of the last electrons
of atoms, while the protons and neutrons of atoms play little role in
chemistry. So well if that malarkey is true then the electrons flowing in
copper should turn copper wire
into nickel wire. Should turn iron atoms into manganese.
> >
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
