Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.chem    |    Chemistry and related sciences    |    55,615 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 54,382 of 55,615    |
|    Archimedes Plutonium to All    |
|    Re: **True Chemistry-- 2018 textbook of     |
|    01 May 18 11:32:53    |
      From: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com              #5page              #5page               On Monday, February 19, 2018 at 8:35:22 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote       in sci.math:       radius of hydrogen proton shrinks too much Re: Chemists are smarter than       Physicists-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV              4th proof is that the radius of the hydrogen proton shrinks too much when a       muon is injected and that contradicts Standard Model. The reason is obvious--       the proton is 840 MeV electron is muon and then you add a second muon.               --- Quoting from www, Ars Technica, Researchers orbit a muon around an atom,       confirm physics is broken ---               So, the proton radius puzzle remains a puzzle. The team behind this new work       point to a number of measurements that could potentially help clarify it. Some       of them involve better measurements with normal electrons; others involve       scattering muons off        protons themselves to see if there's an unknown force at work. The latter       would tell us whether anything beyond the Standard Model will be needed to       explain this puzzle.               --- end Quote ---                      On Monday, February 19, 2018 at 9:52:18 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote       in sci.physics:              only way to explain how a battery works Re: Chemists are smarter than       Physicists-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV              5th proof electrochemical battery is not explainable as Faraday law unless you       concede the battery is a thrusting bar magnet, and thus, the battery is       explained as a dipole magnet of the anode and cathode and the electrolyte       solution is the        ferromagnetism of spins all lined up. And thus a current in the circuit is       because the battery as a thrusting magnet forces monopoles down the circuit       wire.               On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 12:40:26 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote       in sci.math:       spin is charge and charge is spin Re: Chemists are smarter than Physicists--       2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV              6th proof, spin is charge, and charge is spin and the only particle for that       is a ratio of permittivity to permeability as that of 10^-6/ 10^-12 is a       charge energy of 10^6 or 1 MeV for photon charge energy, and that leaves the       proton, electron=muon,        monopole with .5MeV charge energy.                      On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 3:29:39 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote       in sci.physics:              Maxwell Equations are asymmetrical unless you have monopole Re: Chemists are       smarter than Physicists-- 2018 textbook of Experiment-- Real Electron = 105MeV              7th proof the Maxwell Equations are not symmetrical without current being the       flow of magnetic monopoles. Dirac spent most of his life venturing for the       existence of the magnetic monopole, so that electricity is a quantized energy,       to give substance to        the phenomenon of electricity. Well, it turns out that in life, often, what we       are so desperately searching for, is right under our very nose, but just too       blind to see it. The .5MeV particle we thought was the electron is in fact a       photon or neutrino        dressed up with a .5MeV charge energy, not rest mass energy. And the Real true       Electron is the muon at 105 MeV. So, what bothered Dirac about the magnetic       monopole is the Maxwell Equations end up being asymmetrical and that bothered       Dirac immensely and        he kept pushing forward and forward to find that monopole.              On Wednesday, February 21, 2018 at 3:29:49 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium       wrote in sci.math:       Ion theory does not support electron being .5MeV                      8th proof, now, a straightforward proof that the muon is the real-electron can       come from ion theory. The trouble is that weeding out a proof of electron =       muon, is that we get entangled with the magnetic monopole. So, the proof is       simple for ion theory,        to prove the muon = real electron. Take for example iron Fe atoms, they are 26       protons, 26 electrons=muons        Now iron has ion states of -4, -2, -1, +1, +2, +3, +4, +5 +6, +7        So, suppose the electron = .5MeV particle and not the 105 MeV particle        That would mean Iron can exist as iron with 26 protons and only 19 electrons       at one extreme and 26 protons and 30 electrons at the other extreme.        Now in Maxwell theory, there is a law that enforces Conservation of Energy,       called the Lenz law in Faraday law. Otherwise, you have unlimited energy and       Nature does not have unlimited energy.        So that in atoms, the protons become a thrusting bar magnet and the electrons=       real-electrons are the closed loop of wire (inert gases are closed loop wires       and why bonding exists is to close the loop of real-electron structure).        So, the proof that .5MeV are not electrons, is that iron bonds readily with       other iron forming a compound of iron, the metal iron and metallic bond is due       to iron atoms wanting to close the loop of their 26 Real Electrons. They close       that loop by the        metallic bond. That means, the existence of ions from -4 to +7 is unrelated       altogether from Electron configuration. That ions are some other particle       behavior but not the electron nor proton behavior.        The reason iron exists as iron from Fe-4 to Fe+7 is that the particle .5MeV is       a surface interloper particle of atoms, it is a add-on particle not the       integral electron of atoms. If the monopole were the electron we break       conservation of energy by all        these interlopers. The reason the chemical table is all built around the inert       gases, is because Faraday's law must be obeyed and thus atoms with a closed       loop of their electrons seek no bonding of electrons= muons. But atoms that       have no closed loop of        their muons, seek that closed loop structure and thus, they form covalent,       ionic, metallic bonds with other muons of other atoms.               Brief course on IONS in New Physics, for all of Physics and Chemistry are       changed with the revelation that the REAL ELECTRON is the muon particle and       REAL PROTON is 840 MeV.               So, this pretty much changes everything in chemistry, everything.               Ion states        oxidation states Fe -4 to +7 although +2, +3 most common               Now, Fe+2 means the iron atom has 2 magnetic monopoles of + charge present               The Fe-2 ion of iron means it has 2 magnetic monopoles of - charge present               The hydrogen atom has ions of -1 to +1, H+1 means it has 1 proton of 840MeV, 1       electron of 105 MeV, and one magnetic monopole of +1 charge of .5MeV               H-1 means a hydrogen atom as ion has 1 proton of 840 MeV, 1 electron of 105       MeV and one magnetic monopole of -1 charge of .5MeV                      [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca