From: plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com   
      
   Newsgroups: sci.physics   
   Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 12:21:22 -0700 (PDT)   
      
   Subject: Two paradoxes of CO2-- too dense to be global warming gas, and,   
    linear geometry is paradoxical   
   From: Archimedes Plutonium    
   Injection-Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 19:21:22 +0000   
      
   Two paradoxes of CO2-- too dense to be global warming gas, and, linear   
   geometry is paradoxical   
      
   Call it the CO2 Paradox, actually two paradoxes in one.    
      
   __First paradox__ is that CO2 is the densest of atmosphere common gases, the   
   most dense. And being the most dense common gas in the atmosphere it should   
   fall out and not be the greenhouse gas that is causing Global Warming.    
      
      
   78.09% nitrogen    
      
   20.95% oxygen    
      
   .93% argon    
      
   .04% carbon dioxide    
      
   .4% water vapor    
      
      
   ___Second Paradox__ is that CO2 is attributed with a Linear geometry as this    
      
   O=C=O    
      
   Linear covalent double bonds. Yet a linear geometry requires extra energy in   
   formation of the C in the middle spot of a former O to O bonded O2 molecule.   
   That is a paradoxical geometry of linear suggesting for some unknown physics   
   manipulation of a C    
   atom displacing a O=O bonding.    
      
   So we have two paradoxes with Old Chemistry of CO2. How can it be the   
   Greenhouse Gas causing Global Warming if too dense to stay in the atmosphere (   
   I have seen no scientist addressing this issue) And secondly, why would the   
   formation of CO2 be linear    
   when being linear is an added extra cost in energy, when triangular CO2 just   
   as H2O is a triangular molecule, would be the natural formation of CO2.    
      
      
   Why not the O2 molecule impact the C atom and then form this    
      C    
     //\\    
   O=O    
      
   Which is likely that the animal respiration breathing is a triangular CO2.    
      
   Wrestling with these two paradoxes of CO2, the natural and most simple   
   explanation so far, that I have come up with, is that the Greenhouse gas   
   causing global warming is CO, carbon monoxide for it is lightweight and can   
   stay permanently in the atmosphere.   
       
      
   As to why chemists have thought CO2 was linear, is a problem that they used   
   only fire produced CO2 from burning fossil fuels. And a fire produced CO2 is   
   different in geometry from a animal breathing CO2.    
      
   I think that is the best a Logical mind can do on CO2 given the data at   
   present.    
      
   That CO is the global warming gas, not CO2 for it is too dense to stay in the   
   atmosphere. And that the reason the planet Earth's flora is not lush green   
   from all that extra CO2 from fossil fuel burning, is because that CO2 has two   
   geometry forms, it has    
   a triangular CO2 which plants do need, and it has a linear CO2 which is toxic   
   to plants.    
      
   Now there maybe a middle ground explanation, that when fire produced linear   
   CO2 is formed, it is not stable for long and decomposes into CO molecules such   
   as this reaction:    
      
   CO2 + CO2 --> 2CO + O2    
      
   All of which can be answered simply, by collecting animal CO2 specifically,   
   not contaminated with any fossil fuel CO2. How that is to be done is   
   challenging. I suppose take a containment and vacuum out the gases, next,   
   infuse pure oxygen nitrogen mix for    
   an animal. Then place in containment for a period of time to have enough   
   animal CO2, release animal unharmed and find out if that animal CO2 is far   
   different than the linear fossil fuel CO2.    
      
   AP    
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)