From: treon3verdery@gmail.com   
      
   Halbach array magnetic catalysts, inverse of a halbach monopole is a super   
   striated NS magnetic field   
   Spin polarized liquid oxygen and propellers, there is als9 a kind of spin   
   called angular momentum spin. Spin polarizing that could have catalytic   
   effects or novel new ratios of the ratio of translational energy to rotational   
   energy that happens when    
   rocket fuel gets used.   
      
   Magnetic and electric catalysts are published, a magnetic catalyst might be   
   even more active if pole pieces or local magnetic foci were floating in the   
   rocket fuel fluid (or solid) so it's possible ferrocene, or fe2o3 ferrite   
   could cause the catalytic    
   magnetic field lines to actually reach into the bulk of the fuel prenozzle or   
   during nozzle   
      
   Proton hopping electric catalyst 15k times better, so test some new proton or   
   hole or proton conductor granule rocket fuel materials, also lithium in case   
   lithium hopping works, hydrides could contain the hydrogens like lithium   
   hydride   
      
   Reaction area of the rocket catalyst thingy insert   
      
   Mhd hyper mixing, more wiggle and particle motion than would occur at   
   ultrasound, boiling, or nozzle faces nozzle spray; use gantry and drones   
   carrying a 100-1100 meter extension cord to power the mhd magnets. Noting   
   liquid metal on    
      
   External to rocket on the side gantry or even hoisted by a couple crimes could   
   be a 1\2 meter wide 3-7 meter long high Tesla field superconducting magnet, at   
   a published cobalt with magnetism catalyst one single Tesla to 2/10 Tesla   
   magnet causes 300%    
   greater efficiency at catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons with also 650% more   
   detected particle motion. If a 7 Tesla 2020mri machine's magnet is made to be   
   a side of rocket pillar then the first n seconds of the rockets thrust could   
   be catalyzed to be 3    
   times larger and faster. The rocket could match the big external magnet by   
   having a cobalt coating on the reaction chamber or a cobalt atom ferrocene   
   like sandwich molecule, cobalt metal soap, or even cobalt atom containing   
   surfactant molecule, or of    
   course cobalt metal nanoparticles at 1/10 of 1% of the rocket fuel volume.   
      
   The magnetic catalysis and electrical catalysis of rocket fuel to have much   
   higher thrust force can continue even after the rocket has raised above the   
   gantry and is travelling faster than magnet holding, electricity supplying   
   drones. I thought of a way    
   to make the 20 Tesla online Lorentz force quartersquisher to omit explosively   
   disintegrating after every metal reshaping 20 Tesla pulse. That suggests that   
   if the rocket has the electricity highly magnetically catalytic thrust   
   producing fields can be    
   sustained. The rocket, at heights over a kilometer above the ground can have   
   electricity inductive power beamed into it. It may not utilize much   
   electricity to sustain magnetic catalysis, the paper I saw used perhaps .2 to   
   1 Tesla at their catalyst and    
   noted the catalytic effect persisted on their cobalt catalyst for, I think,   
   double digit seconds after each magnetic pulse. Stimulating a magnetic   
   catalyst at the reaction chamber 11 times per second to once each 20 seconds   
   could be measured as to what    
   works better. As a science of magnetic catalysis thing, magnet remenance and   
   hysteris graph could be linked to duration of catalytic activity, especially   
   at catalysts that are already magnetic alloys and elements, so perhaps ultra   
   affordable hard and    
   soft ferrites of different magnetic character where Fe, ru, co, pt, pd,   
   dysprosium, neodymium, catalysts might be previously active.    
      
   Another kind of catalysis I read about is the use of a .6 amp electrical   
   catalyst where ammonia can be made from nitrogen and ch3 an actual 15000 times   
   faster than without the electric field + RuCs catalyst. It is possible to   
   screen a variety of new and    
   published catalysts in parallel automatically, with a simple 8.5x11" test   
   cassette that has 100 known catalysts printed on it and another 100 new   
   possible catalysts on it at Cm circles. The test cassette is then exposed to   
   20 different voltage amount    
   steps, 20 different current amounts, and 20 different pulsing frequencies,   
   both ac, DC, and things like wavelet shapes, soliton shapes, sawtooth, square,   
   and a hat with two bumps on it electric waveforms. If the casette's atmosphere   
   is sniffed with a    
   chemical identifier apparatus once each 2 seconds, then 48,000 different   
   efficacies of the existing, new, and electrically varied catalysts are   
   measured. If 11 cassettes are tested, or 365 days of testing occurs, then over   
   1.5 million catalytic    
   variations are tested. The casette could also test 20 different temperature   
   steps from liquid nitrogen, liquid oxygen, and liquid ch4 temperatures, up to   
   water melting then steam condensation then up through the exhaust temperatures   
   of 2020 cars, then up    
   to and past the melting point of tungsten.   
      
   Some non-rocket fuel applications of catalysts benefit from cool easy to   
   engineer standard temperature and pressure reactors that modify things like   
   fuels, reagents, exhausts, including coal exhausts, factory stack exhausts,   
   and dwelling and commercial    
   building HVAC exhausts to be high utility and beneficial at STP, that reminds   
   me of biochemical enzymes. Developing a knowledge base using say 100 STP or   
   also ice water functional enzymes, then making silicon and germanium atom   
   replacements at those    
   enzymes could make new enzymes that function well below STP as well as above   
   it, combinatorial chemistry that in a single reaction vessel makes a large   
   plurality of alternate forms could make a large variety of alternate forms of   
   enzymes with synthetic    
   amino acids including Si, Be, Boron synthetic amino acids then these tested at   
   an enzymatic/catalytic magnetic and electric activity test cassete   
   Silicon atom and germanium    
      
   Laser peening 3-7 times stronger metal, so liquid oxygen or liquid ch4 could   
   be maintened at less chilled temperatures, thàt could cause 3-7 times greater   
   reactivity, which makes a very rocket enhancing 3-7 greater thrust generation   
   per moment of fuel    
   supply. With sufficiently strong tubes and rocket nozzle higher than ambient   
   warmth O2 or ch4 could react together twice as fast, other big strengtheners   
   to rocket fuel tanks, pipes, and nozzles could be chemical vapor deposition of   
   ultra hard materials    
   like amorphous fullerene glass, and the likely better than AFG where different   
   volumes of fullerene (c20-c900) spheres are used at new types of fullerene   
   glasses   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)