From: treon3verdery@gmail.com   
      
   written previously: possibly making word lists of words new from last week   
   could be beneficial, also pick out three new words to learn like "Monday" or   
   "these" and bring them up again next session. Bring paper to the classroom.   
      
   Suggest the children have what is likely fun reading words that spontaneously   
   occur from a car view. If they don't know the word they can recognize the   
   letters and say first or all letters at "yield" or "mall".   
      
   Look up math analysis online   
      
   Customize honest praise more than saying good or right; John might then hear,   
   " I like the way you repeat the word right after I read it"   
      
   While they are reading most of the text, suggest Gage say the word after I   
   supplementally read it, also Zara   
      
   It might work and thus double practice, "have your parent read this to you   
   again tonight!" "You'll be extra good reading this to your parent because we   
   already practiced!" Gage might do well with this, he likes his family a lot.   
      
   Find lively books for Clayton Dr Seuss rhyming poems might be lively enough to   
   maintain attention while making books and reading actively fun. Practice   
   saying the letters of words so he knows all the letter shapes. dbp etc.   
      
   Mention most beneficial child parent ideas to Shay Stacer like t   
   aching/positioning/medicating (taurine)/staging child produced content that   
   makes the parent feel good and emotionally connected to their children, even   
   though it is prompted, thus they    
   become even nicer to their children   
      
   How big would the detector have to be to measure the entire universal wave   
   function? Is it littler than a universe? Could it be one durable particle   
   responding to gravity? Which brings up how high a resolution is necessary to   
   make an observation "gravity,   
    from all directions, yep. That one particle tells it like it is" Might be   
   less than sufficient. So what is a shannon information theory minimum to make   
   an UWF  observation; if it were a p value it would be eight things.   
      
   The detector that can measure the entire universal wave function, regardless   
   of size might be easier to construct or more math and logic parsimonious than   
   unitary MWI; to some people, but not others, that looks better. Could building   
   a detector capable    
   of observing the entire universal wave function obviate future multiverses? No   
   need for branching when you've got it observed. The thing is JY was able to   
   describe alternate versions of Earth's history (he said there are some without   
   the internet), so JY    
   data might align with the multiverse.   
      
   Just for amusement, what about the parts of the universe that are beyond the   
   light cone of the alleged big bang; are they a boundary between entirely   
   different MWI universe sized wave functions? Hint: quantum entangled photons   
   communicate at least 10,000    
   times faster than light travels so that portion of overlapping space with   
   .000001% naturally occurring quantum entangled photons would have a huge   
   volume overlap or expansion of the MWI area.   
      
   If there is a buildable detector for the entire universal wave function? could   
   the MWI come up with varied universes where it was either working or turned   
   off? That might cause a growth MWI branch and a branchless determined   
   universe. Which is better to    
   live in? Have nonhuman observers already observed and made the universe that   
   humans live at as wave function specific branch determined?    
      
   Could people tell if the entire universal wave function has been previously   
   observed; some approach to verifying or refuting that preobservation could   
   verify or refute or verify the MWI What would act different in a preobserved   
   universe; its remotely    
   possible that the crust of Newtonian deterministic physics comes from some   
   universal resolution of some possibly big quantum thing. So building a   
   universal wave function (UWF). detector, then detecting the UWF, could be   
   measured as to whether it extended    
   newtonianism to some previously unnewtownian area; building the detector would   
   change physics.   
      
   Just for fun, noting there are different sizes of infinities (aleph numbers)   
   could a quantum event detector/MWI branchmaker be constructed that operated at   
   a different higher aleph number of infinities? I may have read that something   
   squared is aleph two    
   compared with all the integers which might be aleph one; so can you use a   
   photon or radiation detector squared some way to hypermultiply the MWI   
   infinity? Although the MWI might address time sequence, do pulsed lasers or   
   standing waves alephtwoize even    
   though they are chrono effects   
      
   Does using that detector cause variation (wobble) at things, among them the   
   casimir effect from some kind of physics thing? Is there a new geometry   
   packing effect, because the technologist made an aleph two detector squared   
   that causes multiverse to pack    
   together differently? is there some way to measure or mathematically predict   
   some anisotropy that could be measured differently from both before and after   
   the aleph two branch apparatus; this way produces three observations to detect   
   the MWI?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)