From: treon3verdery@gmail.com   
      
   Cultivate analytical philosophy of the children's book; of the parts you can   
   remember (from different pages) how do they combine together? Might make   
   thinking even more fun near a book   
   Consider them holding book upright so they focus on it while you read from the   
   back puts their eyes on the text    
      
   Do jokes dispell lackadaisical inattentiveness at children    
      
   Mirror back the children's gestalt words they say "like" I say what do you   
   like or they say easy I say name three easy things. They say fancy I say what   
   are some things you do that are fancy?   
      
   Everytime you get a word right I will put (two dots that get upgraded to happy   
   faces) on this paper; thank you for the strong effort, you can do stuff when   
   you would like to on purpose Perhaps have them draw the faces around the dots   
   so its personalized    
   identification of being happy   
      
   Should I practice my eye contact and smile. I think so.   
      
   Increase attention to a read aloud but ungazed at book, When reading   
   intersperse a funny word in the read text, ask the student to say Beep every   
   time they hear the word, tally the attentiveness causing stimulus with happy   
   face dots. You got 3 beeps!    
   Might work Zara, Gage and Clayton.   
      
   Have Zara teach me something grok her style. Ask about what dolls say to each   
   other. Have Clayton teach me a video game thing.   
      
   .5b plays for dolls; eToy speaks like "doll just found out she has long lost   
   sister" then humans improvise and speak new dialog. The software listens to   
   the humans and suggests new and calculated to be fun plot advancements.   
      
   Asking for their attention has an effect. Perhaps twice a book would not   
   desensitize.   
      
   Be more diligent with sounding out words and a phonics approach   
      
      
   Always leave one thing untouched on your plate BMI normality causing phrase   
      
   Are children quantifiably measurable as having fun doing different things; are   
   children on cruise ships near or higher than at home free time fun? mbti: what   
   do the cruise children do? Some might be meet and greet for E,    
      
   .5b Children on cruise ship digital face thermography and AI of movement to   
   swoop in with fresh and/or reinforcing stuff and make already good experiences   
   great!   
      
   Does green tea have anti distraction pro attentiveness effect on children   
   without ADD; better than well approach deprenyl might longevize children CART   
   peptide as better than well attention increasing drug   
      
   .5b coffee CART better than well   
      
   Dale Carnegie how to make friends and build charisma for children charisma   
   makes it possible to fluently choose new better social groups.    
      
   Zara ups charisma Do you think fancy Nancy has friends? What do they do   
   together->friends are nice, here is how to make friends:carnegie   
      
   .5b software looks at social media of school age peers, AI forecasts which   
   ones would date you if you asked, then also software guides you towards   
   members of that list that would actually be good for you. The result is more   
   confidence, less rejection,    
   and absence of toxic relationships.    
      
      
   If they read nonfiction ask them to summarize it (builds organize, know, act   
   skills) it also practices how to study; Say, name three facts about topic   
      
      
   Genetically engineering all people to have more charisma than any previously   
   measured person is the way to go; mutually charismatic people have beneficial   
   interactions with each other. Both win. Or if at a group there is more plural   
   engaged win, less    
   numb mere attendance.   
      
   Ask about bringing in stickers   
      
   Noting "triple bottom line" or any multi good summary, could complex numbers   
   be a bigger part of business and ethics; graph of 3i+3 intersection with y^3+I   
   That makes it so an ethicist or regular person can graphically compare a   
   benevolent emoter with a productive beneficial scientist   
      
   vaguely, is it better to advance on all fronts simultaneously or to do first   
   things first? (Rescue a child first or file a vaccine patent) Computer science   
   might suggest multifoliate leaves of simultaneity on some branches sorted on   
   preeminence, so if    
   the utility is positive (create, feel) or negative utilitarianism (rescue,   
   ensure) then CS seems to suggest particularized combination of advance on   
   fronts with first things first. CS upgrades though; quantum computers, as I   
   perceive them, advance on all    
   fronts.   
      
   Possible FEA voxels: is FEA of sets with verbs, more or less ethical? Whatever   
   size chunks that you have the mind or computer to calculate affects their   
   ethical depth; FEA: Having your sunscreen rejuvenate your skin while rescuing   
   a child and    
   simultaneously getting a vaccine patent seems sunscreenish trivial but noting   
   math, FEA, and the effect of 3% growth compounded suggest that aggregations of   
   micro benefit could have large volumes of value. This suggests that good   
   things can happen even    
   without a sentience being aware; a decisionless benefit.   
   Noting FEA Voxels produce a geometry of ethical chunks sortalike   
   user-adjustable directional stress tests also can produce emergent   
   godelescherbach cube simultaneous objects with 3 projections    
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)