From: treon3verdery@gmail.com   
      
   " I like the way you pay attention" when it occurs I notably like attentive   
   students, the thing is, is there a "catch them doing something right" way to   
   honestly use this.  Actually it could benefit the good readers as well. It   
   might heighten their    
   already good concentration as well as feel nice to hear.   
   How about "I like it when you pay attention like that." After a moment of   
   successful concentration (Clayton)   
      
   Enzymatic production of CART peptides from food proteins, or some specialized   
   feedstock protein might be possible; that makes them outside government   
   regulation while still being effective drugs. CART peptides might be   
   better-than-well concentration    
   increasers for children even those without ADD.   
      
   Suggest "your child has books! Here are great ways to share reading with them   
   ...and visit the library for more!" minipapers at each give-away book.  It   
   might cause more parent child reading and is cheap.   
      
   Ethics of first things first or advance on all fronts simultaneously   
   Notably FTF can specify branched developable fronts early on or even as   
   branches, first! Then, after branch development processing and prioritization   
   it can address other things or even recalibrate based on the effects from   
   addressing the prioritized    
   branch' plurality first or early on.    
      
   When you think of a computer architecture (quasi metaphorical as I am thinking   
   about actual human ethics) FTF and AFS have the potential to look really   
   different. The 1,1,0 automata is Turing complete; if you think of that 1,1,0   
   thing running parallel (   
   like an automata then that graphically might look like a bunch of trees at a   
   dendritic polymer) on a AFS while a FTF could possibly be more efficient at   
   high velocities and a near serial architecture; then again an early priority   
   for FTF could be    
   optimizing the ethical landscape for high parallelism of action while still   
   having first things first.   
      
   Looking at it like a computer then the kind of actual thing it, the ethics,   
   runs on could be modified. Human body, matter, consciousness, could be   
   adjusted to rapidly solve ethics.   
      
   With FTF who or what perceives the priorities? Is AFS being kind of medianish   
   stochastic less efficient than parallel optimized FTF?   
      
   So then ethically, what is the optimal architecture or way to run that is   
   metaphorically compute ethics and actual human actions on what kind of   
   mechanism?   
      
   Modifying or customizing the mechanism, like serial, parallel, quantum   
   computing, that runs FTF or AFS could cause ultra high ethical well being many   
   orders of magnitude more rapidly.    
      
   One approach is genetic engineering of human beings; another might be   
   fiduciary and/or high signal to noise action linkages where people are   
   strongly guided by computers; do that possibly with finding something actually   
   benevolent and person enhancing    
   with greater utility than the ethics of beguilement(advertisingish) or token   
   value systems (although having libertarian tendencies i note token systems,   
   possibly including money, which has recently gotten better, (bitcoin) preclude   
   some harm while    
   providing discernable rewards) at producing with humans behavior near to or   
   the same as the model's response at a computer simulation. Thinking of nice   
   action causers, What might be functional though is artificial love, like   
   measurably good feeling    
   harmonizing around shared behaviors, possibly with girlfriend (robot   
   girlfriend) or biological imprinting-like trust. Voluntary behavioral   
   psychology positive reinforcement environments could also shift behavior   
   towards an algorithmically mathematically    
   valid ethics.   
      
   It is likely there are other near fiduciary response to a computed ethics   
   technologies. Self help books about actualizing change exist. A person could   
   think about that though.   
      
   Also, what about the lived ethics, or computed ethics of retrocausal   
   modification? (What i think JY said he was doing) when you modify the past   
   with FTF there is a possibility of having a version of FTF from the   
   retrocausalists (only partially globally    
   system aware) proclivities. To the rightmost branch of AFS everything looks   
   like a dove   
      
      
      
    calculation asymmetry; retrocausal electron computer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)