Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.chem    |    Chemistry and related sciences    |    55,615 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 55,138 of 55,615    |
|    Treon Verdery to All    |
|    Longevity technology    |
|    07 Sep 22 09:32:10    |
      From: treon3verdery@gmail.com              The eentsiest genomes have 400 to 1000 genes, I do not know how many million       year lifespan endoliths have, they could do a stochastic gene recombination       with yeast to make millions or billions of yeast with genomes mixed with       endoliths genes, at a liquid        culture, fluorescent yeast that fluoresce a greater amount the longer they       have lived, published flow cytometry that processes 10 million yeast cytes per       second could then also place high longevity yeast at a side channel and screen       a billion yeast with        100 seconds and screen a trillion of the million year endolith yeast hybrids       at 64.9 days, the new longevity genes products could be quantified as protein       and receptor suggestive drugs and the 99.99999999th percentile of these       endolith-yeast hybrids        longevizing genes could be genetically engineered into mice to quantify any       greater longevity at the mice as well as being neutral or beneficial to       wellness, healthspan and cognition              Things that fill children with happiness       A toy that is a psychometric, handheld toy that does hundreds or thousands of       psychometric tests, as 14-40 question rapid fun bunches then asks the other       questions on say a 100 question test later, deep learning AI could validate       fun rephrasings of        existing psychometrics, quantitatively measured as being fun for children and       increasing happiness,        The software could lead with a psychometric test that is the most fun and       where the output always makes the person feel good about themselves (the myers       Briggs is kind of like that), if the software can sense when the child is       about to put the toy aside (       possibly keypress velocity, or with camera body language) then it can start       displaying all fun psychometrics, that way the software which is previously       quantified as being fun and making children happy is, I read more likely to be       remembered as fun,        prompting more frequent utilization, at the parents option the data could be       uploaded online, and also shared with CPU speakers, child-life optimizing and       child-raising text software, and companion robots, this could also be, as a       two or more person        connected tablet software toy causing of children to talk with each other       about new things and rotate between children at timed intervals so everyone,       notably introverts, gets their say about what they think and an opportunity to       talk about themselves,        children with various opportunities for growth or who would benefit from       rescuing could be identified, this might provide early warning on live-in       boyfriends or other adult effects on children while simultaneously making the       children happy, some        psychometrics, or nonpsychometric dialog, could cause children to divulge more       confidences and the software could group and sequence questions to cause the       children to divulge more about how they actually feel and report their own       actions or the actions        of others more accurately, there is an outside chance that with popularity the       software could suggest the child put a visible white and blue bodypaint form       or wear a decorated hat to let other children at school they were compatible       with that they were        open to coversation and play with children of compatible body paint or       scarves, the software could also suggest play dates with other compatible       children at the online component, and parents might like getting the toy as it       causes the children to have        good new friends       This psychometric toy could also benefit adults at making friends and other       benefits, a phone app for adults might be beneficial, also adults often see       more people so going up to other adults with compatible bodypaint or scarves       could be a normal thing        to do              My perception is almost everybody is compatible with MBTI ENFP that are at       70th percentile or above at minimal mental unwellness, other than perhaps FJ.               What about the 99.9th percentile of less likeability and social fluency, who       will socialize with them? These people might sometimes be ISFJ, it is possible       compartmentalized, organized activities of a physical nature like gymnastic       spotters speaking        factually on J-valued improvements at activities that heighten their light       triad amounts would be beneficial, fun, and growthful,               better child environment practices, genetic engineering, and social companion       robots and prosperity make things better for children              Children and prosperity,        as a technology psychometrics could be utilized to find the most optimal       dollar amount of allowances for children, allowances could have more than one       dimension, every 7 days and also three times a year a larger lump sum is given       that the child could use        as they prefer, like an investment, or a higher value thing, the lump sum       could be the equivalent of half a day or a full day of a parent's earnings and       be given regardless of behavior                                                               Synthetic genome organism longevity                     Longevity technology       The eentsiest genomes have 400 to 1000 genes, I do not know how many million       year lifespan endoliths have, they could do a stochastic gene recombination       with yeast to make t       Things that fill children with happinedd              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca