From: treon3verdery@gmail.com   
      
   Greater tolerance of child like behaviors at school could make children happier   
   I think some of children's actions make them happy, perhaps sometimes with an   
   immediate focus, while sharing and teaching reading one of the students picked   
   up a chair, put it on his head and twirled it around, but his facial   
   expression and vocal tone    
   were neutral, it could have just been being lively, I thought it was a fine   
   thing to do, I thought about what the kindergarten teacher might think, at a   
   more tolerant environment other children might have imitated him and some   
   chairs might be audible or    
   provide distraction to all the students in the room simultaneously, if it   
   takes the teacher 3, 7, or 9 minutes to get all the children to recommence   
   their learning, and this happens twice a day then that is about 4% of the days   
   education missed out on, i    
   think it is possible to make education much more effective, and just 4%   
   greater improvement among the much greater improvement possible would make it   
   possible to tolerate more childish behaviors. It is possible that tolerance   
   would make children happier.    
   So for every 14% increase in educational efficiency 2% of the gain is utilized   
   at tolerance of noneducational behaviors then a 100% increase in educational   
   effectiveness would be 14.2% greater time children's noneducational behaviors   
   could be tolerated    
   while maintaining notable gains in educational effectiveness. That is about   
   8.52 minutes of extracurricular activity per child per hour, if that   
   chronological interval were utilized to make children happier, then children   
   would be happier, the thing is,    
   what is the way to double the effectiveness of education. Terence Tao has an   
   IQ of 200, it is likely he learns more than twice as fast as others, germline   
   gene modification to make people, that is persons, that is humans, that is   
   homo sapiens 3, 4, 5, 9,    
   10, 11, 20, 21, 22, 23, or 24 times more intelligent than Treon Verdery   
   beneficially multiply the effect of education and causes the amount of   
   tolerance of children's behavior to go way up, making them happier.   
      
      
      
      
   Longevity technology   
   Human growth hormone is associated with greater wellness and I think   
   healthspan, but not longevity, screen a million molecular variants to find out   
   if any cause greater longevity at yeast, a few thousand variants could be   
   screened with the outdoor mouse    
   dorm. Also human thought could go into localization of human growth hormone to   
   concentrate it at certain areas (possibly CNS and muscles and peripheral   
   nervous system) and away from areas it might be deleterious like the   
   cardiovascular system. Putting    
   localization moieties at the human growth hormone protein could facilitate   
   that. Also there may be SNP variations and allele variations among humans.   
   Among supercentenarians over 115 those gene variants that contribute most to   
   healthspan and wellness    
   could be considered, thoughtfully, and the effect on the lifespan of the   
   entire human distribution considered before making drugs and optional gene   
   therapies, there could also be a drug addressable epigenetic component   
      
   Semiconductor technology   
   It is possible that some integrated circuit materials have higher feature   
   resolutions than 3nm or 1nm, making things out of those materials with regular   
   engineering compatible feature performance that is eentsier than the entire   
   full range of    
   semiconductor materials is beneficial, perhaps elements like K and Na coated   
   with larger SiO2 would omit reacting with anything but still have utility at   
   MEMS or even conductive pathways between other features   
      
   Photonic technology   
      
   Genetics of being an autodidact. It is possible being an autodidact has a   
   genetic component, they could look at the genetics of autodidacts and find out   
   if anything is associated with it, psychometrics might find cognitive   
   components of being an    
   autodidact and they could find out if the components had separate findable   
   genetics and then find out if people with all of those separate components at   
   the population were more autodidactic, then it could be a beneficial part of   
   the germline at all    
   humans   
      
   I favor children being taught they have a right to turn machines off. I favor   
   making machines so beneficial, and at robots that emulate personality, so   
   benevolent children and adults seek them out and turn them on and keep them on.   
      
   I favor all artificial intelligence and robots be nonsentient.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)