From: treon3verdery@gmail.com   
      
    I read 2-3% of the earths energy use goes to powderizing rocks, bringing that   
   to 1% provides the energy about 150 million people use annually, loading   
   eentsy and medium chips together then grinding might cause vertex pressure   
   points to disintegrate    
   faster causing preferred powder size distributions   
      
   Images of mineral grinders I have seen have grinding areas at the perimeter,   
   perhaps acoustics, among them solitons, could be used to shake sort the middle   
   to optimize the size of mineral chunks that meet the perimeter to optimize   
   powder size math    
   distribution, also, could a central vertical mineral fragmenter stamp the   
   middle area to make more rock fragments of the right size faster, that is kind   
   of like 1/4 more minerals ground per machine   
      
   I may have read grinding minerals is 2-3% efficient, making explosives an   
   order of magnitude more affordable might complement grinding to heighten   
   efficiency, a machine that uses nitrogen from air and a carbon source like co2   
   could make a continuous    
   stream of trinitrotoluene, one possibility is a fractal reactor like a   
   zeolite, a fractal catalyst coated or part of the molecule, cyclodextrin, or a   
   comparatively higher volume gas centrifuge with catalysts at the membrane,    
      
   A reactor that makes trinitrotoluene superaffordably to complement or replace   
   2-3% efficient mineral grinding, as a technology, a catalytic, sparse at the   
   medium semiconductor or conductor sponge with a predictable electron traversal   
   path that although    
   bulk produced does not overlap much and is a kind of amorphous form, make a   
   bunch of fractal 1-3 nanometer wide highly conductive semiconductors or   
   conductors, at a sponge form, optimally react them to put catalytic atoms at   
   their fractal tips, then coat    
   them with a solid nonconductive gas permeable coating like custom channel size   
   PTFE or another polymer, then compress them into shapes, sinter them to   
   mechanical durability, or just load a column with the catalytic atom tipped   
   fractal, sparse enough to    
   omit being a direct conductor with PTFE or other gas permeable polymer   
   material, the gas permeable polymer sinters to the other polymer coated   
   fractals, and then when nitrogen and a carbon containing gases (possibly   
   toluene vapor) are pumped through it,    
   the mostly non overlapping conductors or semiconductors provide charge at the   
   fractal tips and the catalytic atoms like Rh or Co or a more affordable   
   catalyst catalyze the nitrogen being attached to the carbon containing   
   molecule, at cool temperatures    
   that minimize risk, the charge density at the fractal tips could be high   
   enough to function similarly to the (diffetent) ammonia making process   
   temperature, it is even possible discharge arcing, like carpet and doorknob   
   plasma bolts, only nanometers big    
   could provide nanolocal temperature and charge sufficient to get the nitrogen   
   gas to react with the carbon containing gas or vapor like toluene vapor, the   
   nitrated carbon chemicals would then travel out of the column from pressure or   
   vacuum as a    
   condensible vapor or fluid stream and the cool temperature on site   
   trinitrotoluene producing reactor could then complement mineral grinders to   
   powderize minerals more efficiently, benefitting people,   
      
   I read the energy the system uses to produce the explosives is at least some   
   higher than the energy of the explosives themselves, I think I read vegetable   
   oil actually has more kilojoules per mole than nitro explosives, it is just   
   that the chemical    
   motion change at TNT is so rapid when it causes motion from expansion, that it   
   can disintegrate other things, possibly at $2.00 per gallon at gasoline TNT   
   could be $4-9 a gallon at 50-22% reactor efficiency or $19 a gallon at 9%   
   efficiency, also it could    
   be more affordable than this as electricity, notably off-high-demand   
   electricity, is more affordable than gasoline,   
   The use of fractal conductors or semiconductors with catalytic element tips   
   provides other adjustable things that could benefit the reaction, input   
   voltage and current and AC frequency, also skipping the hook-up wires, things   
   like fractals tuned to    
   absorb electromagnetic energy, EM,, like wireless phone charging could   
   electrically energize the fractals   
      
   If nitroalkanes are explosive that would be even more affordable than TNT to   
   produce    
      
   Has anyone made nitroexplosives from silicone polymers or silicone molecules   
   (Sitoluene?) as an explosive, it might be less sensitive while still having   
   full nitrogen explosion energy   
      
   Vibration and acoustic stochastics might be tunable    
      
   If a 60 decibel mild gentle soliton meets your ear does it transmit almost no   
   energy, and is much less audible, audio speakers could broadcast to hundreds   
   of times further areas causing perceived loudness of a speaker to be the same   
   over an acre which    
   could benefit concert sound systems   
      
   I read they use solitons now at internet fiber optic repeaters, could solitons   
   or partial 30% solitons be used at WiFi to gain further distances   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)