From: treon3verdery@gmail.com   
      
   If the Gödel Escher Bach light cube was actually a different shape, and every   
   face was a vector graphic, the two reflections that cause the images to be   
   right side up and right side right would reach the parabola coated with   
   casimir flashlight from the    
   math topology the leading equation part would always have the time traversing   
   the parabola be utilized to magnify the details whether you went near or far   
   or viewed at an angle the vector graphics resolution would always be higher   
   than the cube   
      
   Could that also be utilized at each node at the network to make the kinds of   
   variability that could occur have a  so travel,    
      
   I think I should think about how to make the network of all the things a girls   
   kindergartner does like goes near her friends and talks with them, how she   
   does certain things at certain times because of the teacher and how to   
   optimize thatp   
      
   Should the casimir flashlight coating build nodes faster than the nodes can run   
      
   A thing about theMWI is that because there are, i read,more branch universes   
   than the source universes and they all make casimir flashlights with some   
   multiple of casimir flashlight output that is used at the multioptimal network   
   does that make    
   communicating MWI universes (like overlapping MWI) does that give the capacity   
   of the casimir flashlight at the source universe the ability to make more   
   light, if so then the casimir flashlight can make more network nodes, arraying   
   them at nonsaturated    
   topology, than the network, at any velocity can saturate, the benefit is that   
   thinking of kindergartners at kindergarten they are so saturated they ignore   
   things. Some of the time rather than seeking the higher and higher vector   
   graphic detail that PLLs    
   their output, PLL bringing the ability to be on specification sufficiently to   
   have a mathematically optimal output (perhaps one nonsentient node is making   
   new vector graphics being informed and valenced from the other nodes) so that   
   kind of originates    
   optimality   
      
   To produce optimumness if a sentience does something benevolent or filler-like   
   at the network the nonsentient nodes have numerous mathematical constructions,   
   the sandwich theory of calculus with internode connections that create math    
   noting the    
   multiples of output of the casimir flashlight, and making nodes at a   
   connection topology at higher velocity than they can be saturated if the   
   sentience has any output to the network, mathematically because of the   
   connection topology of the nodes the    
   sentiences behaviors will always be less than saturation as well as greater   
   than nonactivity because of the sandwich theory of calculus    
      
   Is it possible for a network to be optimal if the sentience is only partially   
   attentive; the nodes store utilize and transmit data, transform things,   
   replicate and recycle, depending on the sentiece, and the variety of   
   nonattentiveness it is possible to    
   use true neutral voluntary stimulus to cause a behavioral tropism at less than   
   the threshold of awareness of the sentience, if the network notices the   
   sentience has noticed anything then the stimulus thought to be neutral ceases   
   occurring and a different    
   truly neutral nonperveptible stimulus is utilized, the MWI could have   
   accessible either what the sentience is likely to like, noting it can be   
   encouraged as a tropism absent ever reaching the consciousness of the   
   sentience, or, there could actually be a    
   transfinitude of true neutral nonperceptible stimulus as available MWI data,   
   if the sentience remains inattentive then the math of (is, is a different   
   thing, did not think to participate, had not actually heard or thought of   
   participating), the network    
   is nonsentient, so the math concept of not in use or I have not read next   
   years textbook yet have a math space. I will find out if I can do better than   
   that as I am thinking optimum networks go with continuous math functions,   
   thinking about optimal    
   networks of kindergarteners   
      
   Another opportunity is making the math space the network is built at and built   
   of is to find the math system that makes iterated function compression take as   
   few or fewer steps to compress as it does to iterate, or at topology or   
   geometry, simply look up    
   a graphic or utilize an equation with a noniterated solution if you like you   
   can record everything on the internet, find a tree with trillions or   
   quadrillions of leaves and pack it into a human rememberable number sequence,   
   that when a function, cellular    
   automata or something is repeatedly applied to it the data string grows and   
   after a number of iterations the original data, the entire internet is   
   produced, what I perceive college professors and Microsoft found out about   
   this is that it takes a bunch of    
   computing cycles to compress the data tree to seed and equation or cellular   
   automata action table. I think that it could be possible for a person to ask a   
   mathematician "i heard there are noncommutative algebras and that factoring in   
   them is less easy,    
   might take more steps, or sometimes comes up with a big plurality of   
   solutions, looking at it the other way is there such a thing as a   
   hypercommutative algebra or topology where factoring is many times easier and   
   uses fewer operations" note the    
   hypercommutative algebra does not need to be supportive of the rest of known   
   math" then the mathematician says well actually at a completely equational   
   treatment of the 4th dimension it is absent possibility for a knot to stay   
   knotted, the extra movement    
   coordinates make it just slide apart, a topology that causes hyper commutation   
   might actually have less than three dimensions because you are changing the   
   number of state spaces available so there are a different fewer number, one   
   thing that might    
   function is a new fractal dimension between 1 and 2 or 2 and 3 like 2.7   
      
      
      
      
      
   The simplest kind of a casimir flashlight is just an array   
      
   Fun thing: a protein that makes a bunch of spaced fins so the space between   
   the fins is the right size to generate casimir effect photons, electrons and   
   even atoms, as a dry heap, at half the volume being gaps a kg of the protein   
   would generate I think,    
   a measurable amount of photons and electrons. There are many ways to produce   
   this, visible photons could be produced   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)