Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.chem    |    Chemistry and related sciences    |    55,615 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 55,319 of 55,615    |
|    Treon Verdery to All    |
|    Semiconductor technology (1/2)    |
|    03 Oct 22 07:44:59    |
      From: treon3verdery@gmail.com              Surface mount IC technology, pick and place robots could stack SMC components       on top of each other, saving board space, having 14 micro contacts per upper       surface, and having any one or few of them sufficient to carry the current,       while engineered to        contact at all 14 heightens reliability, if metal Velcro is a thing then       pressing them together omitting solder could be possible and adhere to       engineering specifications, nonoxidizing metal Velcro heightens reliability       and lifespan                            MWI technology              Whenever you search for something and click on a search output item the       software opens up an extra browser tab from finding the most benevolent and       beneficial result (thesaurus similar meaning words) on the third through 9th       pages of results, sometimes        people will view it, sometimes it will make them think, and sometimes they       will learn about a less SEO optimized, less mainstream thing about what they       are searching about, it is possible it will prompt benevolence and benefit, at       the MWI these could be        different sites informing people of different things and causing different       knowledge and different actions with a tropism towards benevolence and benefit       from parsing the link descriptors, this is a browser add-on with mildly white       and blue tropism                            Regoogle, it makes Google or Bing better from parsing the first 24 pages and       uses deep learning to put half of what the deep learning AI on your computer       thinks you will like and half beneficial diversity, among those search results       with the most        benevolent and beneficial thesaurus words                            Software browser add-ons that address the 9 most popular sites and Imgur (a       meme image site), deep learning AI at the browser notes the time you spend on       each imgur image (rapid click through suggests lack of interest, mouse       movement to read text and        comments suggests high interest) then with that data sample gives you the       ability to view "My Imgur", that is graphic memes the AI thinks you will like       based on previous dwell time at other images and deep learning AI' noted image       matching ability as        well as text cues like body text and favorable language comments, this could       be a part of ReGoogle or ReBing which could decorate each page with a graphic,       a meme the AI thinks you will like, this could be modified at the       configuration menu                                                        Concentrating elements from seawater with microorganisms, is it possible to       make spongelike charged proteins, possibly spaced beta sheets or similar with       charged amino acids, or even more highly charged synthetic amino acids, that       microorganisms could        make, and at better technology move from the endoplasmic reticulum to the       cytosurface like receptors, perhaps existing receptor genes could just have       codon sequences that say make a bunch of ion-exchange resin functioning-like       proteins at a location at        the existing receptor gene and it would get transported to the cytosurface                            It occurs to me that at 2019 US homeless persons were about 1 out of every 300       people. At nations with just 10 million people philanthropists could provide       photovoltaic Costco huts ($1200), with portable toilets, continuous video and       audio at the area,        lighting and a portable shower building for their 33,333 homeless people (or       fewer depending on the country) for about 69 million US $ at $2000 per person.       There could be a simultaneously utilitarian method, this could be combined       with the vacant        commercial land being developable into the riskless, financially neutral,       generator of greater numbers of parks method, change to the law. Another       simultaneously utilitarian way to do this is credit unions voluntarily setting       aside .01% of the accrued        interest on typical US 250k-300K dwellings to finance a $2000k Costco mini hut       dwelling for the homeless. The credit union could then use the projected value       of each $250-300k dwelling loan with factoring to create an immediate amount       of money to order        the mini-huts. This could have advertising appeal to banks, at 2019, "finance       with us and provide a homeless person with shelter until 2062" (42 year       durability of Costco mini hut). The combination of 4 out of 100 people       financing through banks and all        the people financing through credit unions would generate mini-huts from 7-14%       of all dwelling financing. At the US with about 79 million 2019 financed       dwellings value 21.7 trillion at 7% voluntary participation and .01% interest       is 1.5 billion $, that        is about 2/3 of the amount required to provide minihuts for all the homeless       people in the US, at a 9.3% participation rate the full amount is covered. I       read people in the US move about every seven years, if so then it is possible       every 11 years 79        million dwelling refinances occur (some people do not move), which makes the       process take that long, and much more rapidly at some areas (credit unions       like to reinvest in local communities, banks can remit funds where the       opportunity is greatest). Also,        it could be a standard part of the credit unions' and banks' package for       people opting for the dwelling for homeless program, the financing corporation       could provide a "this months interest rate or next months interest rate       whichever is lower" standard        option, half of all the people financing dwellings would gain lower interest       rates a month later making their financing more affordable.. The financial       companies could figure out the difference between the two interest rates       dollar values, perhaps 1-2%        change at the initial interest rate, so perhaps $20-40 to cover the difference       for one month, if the banks charged $60 for the lowest interest rate occurring       over two months option they would earn 33-300% profit from making the product       available at that        fee, and more if they rolled it into the dwelling loan. There is however the       value to the bank of immediately transferring the financing to another       financial company and getting money up front. Of course a "this months       interest rate or less" financial        product could be created even without the dwellings for the homeless aspect.       Another possibility is that people nice enough to opt for the dwellings for       the homeless financing package are quantifiably better credit risks and so the       .01% is covered with        the reduction of risk to the financial institution. That would be functional       up to median credit risk, possibly causing as much as 49% participation. I       read about a philanthropist that gave $1 billion to a form of government and       they could have done        something more beneficial.                                   [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca