Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.chem    |    Chemistry and related sciences    |    55,615 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 55,346 of 55,615    |
|    Treon Verdery to All    |
|    Gene logic (1/3)    |
|    04 Oct 22 01:16:03    |
      From: treon3verdery@gmail.com               possible that without antibodies, this would cause autophagy at virus inected       cytes from their being at 30th percentile or less of wellness quantifications,       the incidental antiviral effect could be beneficial to both the person, and       even possibly reduce        the amount of viruses circulating at the population. The 30th percentile of       wellness autophagy technology could be a nonimmunosystem new to me approach       that kind of incidentally removes virus infected, oncocyte, and even possibly,       fiberous nonutility        tissue, which might be replaced with weller cytes. It is kind of like a new to       me, multipurpose, new (30th percentile quantified effect at any nonoptimality)       kind of senolytic, with different criteria than various intracyte deleterious       products like        interleukins;                            the versionbs of these technologies or others that create longevity, wellness,       and healthspan beneficial new versions of autophagyor germline enhancement or       optimization                                          Longevity technology: an antiglycation mechanism could be found at some       animals then tested at mice anfd humans to see if it increased longevity,       healthspan, and wellness, also, gene variations at humans like SNPs could be       correlated with wellness and        absence of or reduced glycation at humans, and then causality measured with       mouse studies to find beneficial genes for human gene enhancement or also       optimization; notably though I perceive plants also do the nonpreferred       glycation of proteins, so        anything at plants that is produced at cytes that reduces glycation could be       tested at the mammalian genome to find out if it benefits longevity, wellness,       and healthspan, notably the 40,000 year old King’s holly, the 10,000 year       old creosote bush, and        the 4k year old conifer might each have a different plant genetics of       antiglycation that benefits their longevity that could be tested at mice and       humans.                            When a person gets gene therapy, they might like having a way to utilize their       previous genome at some or even all their cytes: backup with gene therapy:       crispr/cas9 appends the new genome to the previous genome, puts a start codon       (or start codon group)        imaginably at a sticks-out circly pouf on the nucleotide double lane topology,       the body ignores the first, previous, genome, which might even have some stop       codons crispr/cas9ed into it at easily recognized locations (sort of like       restriction enzymes say        “thing here” perhaps stop codons could be placed at the previous genome       anytime a CCCCC occured, so if editing it out it would be near errorless to       utilize the previous genome, if the utilizer felt like it.                             I have not read about any siRNA longevity molecules, It is possible these are       possible, and that siRNA that heighten AMPK and decrease mTOR (or another 60%       greater mouse longevity mTOR drug, that works on just mTOR1 rather than mTOR1       and mTOR2), siRNA        might be even better at reaching the CNS through the blood brain barrier as       their AMU is less than some other nucleotides                                                        I perveive there might be a million or more actin lanes per cyte, at 70       trillion cytes, that could be like a math iteration structure with a really       large number of math areas to model, algorithmize, and generate, something       like interpretations about        things as compared with, and possibly as a beneficial resource to the brain       and CNS; Like what if the 70 trillion cytes with actin paths simulated       various effects of various possible things, and communicated the modelling       results with a one thing one        meaning language;                            um, I perceive how DNA per cyte has lots more data space, it is just that       actin paths also have lots of functional movement, geometry, spatial       accessibility…                            It likely already exists, but is there a CRISPR/cas9 automatic gene sequence       linker? I perceive different lengths of DNA have different easiness of       transfection like 3/4 a decade ago (2011), but the perception I have of of       CRISPR/cas9 is that they have        figured out how to make. transfer, and activate things with out about 20,000       genes with simultaneous high velocity, high accuracy, and high editing sucess       (transfection); complementing that, perhaps at a variety of sizes, could be       something that is        effective at attaching one sequence to another, at a functional place and       physical form, (imaginably, histonated, less histonated, a loopy part       available because of a mitosis, translation as well as transcription event,       meiosis, or some new thing that is        new to me)                            so, one approach is to find the easiest histones on earth; some mammal has       histones with really long, super editable, physical like-new preservationess       above other mammalian histones, really available DNA; completely making a       synthetic sequence of that,        then making if even more genetic engineering friendly, then placing it at a       variety of mammals, likely including humans, could benefit DNA transcript       fidelity, DNA preservation, translation velocity at organisms, like humans, as       well as heightening        beneficial, functional, engineering friendly genetic editing, modification and       genetic engineering;                             Also, besides unlooping things, and actually I have no idea what they do, but       I perceive DNA is unusually accessible during translation, mitosis, meiosis,       and possibly some kind of “make this” thing that something at the nucleus       says, like imaginably,        if something says “make ribosomes” perhaps hundreds of ribosome making       DNA locations get sequentially availabilized rather than just like one, over       and over again; so, it seems possible they have tried loading up a well human       cyte with a numerous        quantity of things to translate at DNA, so they could unspool a bunch of DNA,       efficiently, and edit it;                            Along with making like a big list of DNA access producing translation       instructions, they might have some amazing thing like a DNA translation       smoothified new to me histone that makes DNA completely available to editing       (like crispr cas9 or more advanced)        while being a place to have a lot of DNA stay linear, functional, well,       effective, and immediately ok to utilize without repairs; the smoothified       histone could even be nifty at some ethynilization methylization       optionalizing, gene modification now able        to be unaffected from methylization and ethynilization molecular topology       effect; a smoothified histone like an inspection and upgrade access area of an       airplane;                                    [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca