Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.chem    |    Chemistry and related sciences    |    55,615 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 55,347 of 55,615    |
|    Treon Verdery to All    |
|    could cofocalized lasers put eentsy line    |
|    04 Oct 22 01:20:32    |
      From: treon3verdery@gmail.com              Longevity technology: Halogenation like fluorination causes corticosteroids to       be 1000 times more active at a particular mg of dose, ethynylization causes       progestins and estrogens to go from .3mg to .03 mg, although I perceive, or       perhaps just would like        it to be more orders of magnitude; simultaneously halogenating and       ethynylizing longevity drugs like rapamycin, royalactin, 10HDA, acarbose,       metformin and others could give them 100-10,000 times the effect per mg dose;       this causes 200 year duration        depot injections to be, at rapamycin’s 89 mg/24 hours to be .0089 mg/24       hours, the 60% longevity increase at mice could be thought of as 90 days or       near 14 years of continuous human dosing as a ratio fraction. 14 years of       halogenated ethynylized        rapamycin at .0089/mg/24 hours is 1093 mg, or about a one gram, one dose depot       injection that could make humans live 60% longer. Another thing that could       create even eentsier dosage mg is linking the halogenated ethynylized       rapamycin to a capillary        epithelial membrane transport peptide or protein; it is possible that this       modifies the dose to produce the longevity function to be .5 to .1 the dose of       nontransport moeity halogenated ethynylized rapamycin, that causes the 60%       longevity dose to be a        depot injection of 547 mg to 54.7 mg. It is possible a variety of other       longevity drugs as well as new longevity drugs would benefit from the       halogenation and ethynylization and membrane transport moeity construction.                            I read that epithalon (AEDG peptide) combined with thymosin peptide causes       people to be about 4 times less likely to be dead after 6 years; I also read       that during the 20th century infectious disease was the biggest cause of       mortality among people under        five years of age; administering epthalon with thymosin to babies, at the same       interval as caused the four times reduction of mortality, or utilizing a one       dose depot injection, or a one dose gene therapy version that produces       epithalon as well as        thymosin endogenously, or also a germline modification could remove the       leading cause of mortality amongst children under five.                            could an enteric capsule full of liposomes, perhaps similar to a fish oil gel       cap be even more effective than liposomes or an enteric capsule on it own? If       so, greater effect at few mg could be an effect.                            Does epithalon coadministered with thymosin’s near four times reduction of       mortality have any effect on malaria, either transmission receptivity or       mortality? Bill Gates might value that; administered as an enteric pill for       three to fourteen doses once        is similar to the online description of epithalon with thymosin dosing; it is       possible an enteric gel cap full of liposomes could keep the peptides       functional while making mg/dose more effective.                            I do not know if liposomes can transport long lasting palmitate linked to       active drug molecules so that the oily kind of thick material still functions       as a depot drug even though it is transported via the GI tract; if a liposomal       depot drug is possible        then epithalon with thymosin as a palmitate could be a 1-3 month functional       continuous dose, which is similar to what I read about online (2 weeks of       daily doses, 6 months or 365 days apart); that permits an oral capsule one or       twice a year drug that        reduces risk of mortality about four times.                            I read near 2019 AD numbers on things that cused mortality, changing those       things causes more people to be alive, longer; I read poisoning causes near       40,000 mortality occurences annually, more than motor vehicle accidents; What       I read mentioned that        people taking a different than optimal dose, of a drug different than what       they thought they were taking was one of the causes of poisoning: At the       bathroom, or wherever people take pills, a computer with a camera could watch       people take their pills        then alert them if they were taking a different than usual amount of a pill,       among the possibilities are a dish the person puts their pills into before       taking them, or a computer scanned vanity surface (likely based on a surface       existing at their        dwelling), or a computer, perhaps with artificial intelligence like deep       learning, simply watching them grab pill containers, put some in the hand and       swallow them; The computer then tells them before thay take the dose that it       is an error quantity, or,        if the dose has already been taken, audibly urge them to visit an affordable       within-the-hour treatment medical service, at 2019 AD one description of these       was “urgent care”; the computer could also alert relatives or audibly       activate a dwelling        partner’s phone and tell the dwelling partner about the occurence if they       had greater than a .05% chance of a mortality event or other lasting       physiological nonoptimality.                            I read that near 2019 AD poisoning caused more mortality than vehicle       accidents; Software, possibly artificial intelligence like deep learning has       cameras at the entire dwelling and scans the entire dwelling for poison       hazards then suggests changes like        moving potentially hazardous things to places like the garage, or even       suggests using a pharmacy that puts pills in noticeably different shaped and       patterned containers so there is less risk of medication error; a more       affordable version that might        function globally is to have the person video video their entire dwelling,       upload the video to the internet cloud, and have a particularly effective       piece of software or artifical intelligence figure out suggested changes; at       the developed world, health        maintenance organizations, or also insurers might make money providing this as       a complimentary service, even paying $ when the person modifies their       poisoning risk.                                   [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca