From: treon3verdery@gmail.com   
      
   Dave Pearce “shroedingers neurons” way of looking at: if observation,   
   notably from a superobserver, changes content and span of sentience, thoughts,   
   and feeling, as well as other things: superobserver mechanism like 8 trillion   
   elements (flash drive    
   IC technology) is used at a person, voluntarily, to observe the quantum   
   states, and perhaps resolve them from superposition (Dave’s schoedinger’s   
   neurons idea) at the person’s own brain, or other parts of the body; The   
   superobserver causes quantum    
   resolution superposition resolution perhaps billions of times faster and with   
   trillions, or higher, of parallel observations.  From Dave’s “schoedingers   
   neuron” idea, if superobserver observation changes isness, sentiece,   
   feeling, as well as    
   possibly quantitatively measurable effects of (like external action frequency   
   change),  I do not knowhow to distinguish the observation and possible quantum   
   resolving effects of getting a MRI, notably at the CNS, from possible   
   spintronic chemical effects    
   on the CNS, although if magnetic fields are constant among MRI, increasing the   
   computer resolution at specific brain areas like the nucleus accumbens could   
   function as an observer resolving of quantum superposition    
      
      
      
   Dave: write up the things that can verify.refute/enhance Dave’s   
   “schoedingers neurons” idea as a Quora item.   
      
      
      
   If There is a quantum component to beingness and sentience and feelings and   
   other things, then a brain-region specific superobserver could optimize things   
   like nucleus accumbens activity and activateability, as well as even possibly   
   neurons of a certain    
   type like dopmaine neurons.   Perhaps a parent can benefit their child when   
   they view an MRI of them, or utilize a superobserver with software made to   
   benefit the child, that notices everything that is going right, to make it go   
   well more durably. Being    
   superobserver directed with software it might evenbe possible to make a few   
   billion or more observations where the observation only gets written to   
   storage if it goes right; also, (8 trillion item array at a flash drive; many   
   voxels at fMRI)If there is a    
   quantum resolution component to isness of being as well as a way to enhance   
   and durabilize biochemistry thena superobserver that diagnoses only well being   
   and capability is beneficial, also pleasant tointeract with and hear from.    
   There could even be    
   software weighings of how much to observe based on a sample.  Some things   
   might be more chemically active after superobserver observation, so those that   
   are beneficialtohave more activity at would be observed; some chemicals,   
   possibly cholesterol, has    
   cardiovascular effects, observing those into chemical activity and durability   
   would likely be nonbeneficial.  Superobserver samples and then avoids   
   superobserving a physiosystem or mental biochemical thing which has a data   
   trend of: its better not to    
   instantiate and durabalize some system, chemical, tissue, protein or other   
   thing.   
      
      
      
   Also, there is sampling a system to see if the trend is going well, and if the   
   trend is not going well, to omit observing it at any amount greater than the 1   
   part per million or billion sample superobserved.   
      
      
      
   a superobserver viewing things going right, with the directing software having   
   a purpose of causing greater duration of well being and capability, could be a   
   medical technology among people of all ages.  Rather oddly, a big magnet, and   
   or a mechanism    
   with computer superobserver could be a veterinary technology as well.    
   agriculturalists could MRI their chickens, going with absence of MRI   
   resolution at areas they prefer to minimize observer effects on, but perhaps   
   really emphasizing myoglobin    
   molecules existence at the chicken, causing them to be muscularly advantaged   
   thus more edible.   
      
      
      
   Dave’s “schroedinger’s neurons” drug; spintronic chemicals, among them   
   possibly the longevity increasing spin trap chemical N-tert-alph   
   -phenyl-butylnitrone (PBN) I read about, could be concentrated and or   
   localized as beneficial or harmless    
   agents at the CNS and the rest of the body;    
      
      
      
   as to Dave’s quantum observer effects they could test: spintronic   
   chemical/contrast agent with active fMRI, placebo contrast agent, no spin   
   effect, fMRI of less resolution,  fMRI at reduced software resolution except   
   brain region of interest,    
      
      
      
   for dave: when you observe one part of a quantum system, are the other parts   
   you omit observing or measuring affected?  Like, if I weigh a quantum   
   computer, does it effect the qubits?  If I find out how many degrees K it is   
   at, perhaps receiving warmth    
   photons it emits without sending any interrogative photons, does that data   
   resolution effect any of the quantum superposed,possibly electron things that   
   make the quantum computer function?   
      
      
      
   I read that different quantized things, notably matter, energy, and   
   everything, with the possible exception of information and presence of being   
   describable at physics as waves, can have different areas of separate   
   observation, weighing and scanning the    
   photonsof warmth emittedfroma quantumcomputer does ntoa s far asI knowresolve   
   it.  I actually thought it was theother way, like if you have an electron emit   
   a photonthe electron got immanentized, having things like location and   
   velocity.  There might be    
   some observations, or observation methods, like electrons or photons meeting a   
   semiconductor, that observe numerous systems or characteristics    
   imultaneously, there might be others like measuring polarization, spin, even   
   frequency and wavelength that    
   leave most of the quantum superposed thing, mostly unresolved.   
      
   So for Dave’s “schroedinger’s neurons” Idea, how many observables or   
   measurables are thereat conscious being?  Like with light there are a bunch:   
   polarization,spin, wavelength, frequency, likely others.  So it is possible   
   that at Dave’s idea,    
   if quantum things have anything to do with consciousness, that there might be   
   a list of observables or adjustables.   
      
      
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)