On Saturday, June 30, 2018 at 10:29:09 PM UTC-4, #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:   
   > On 06/30/2018 10:51 AM, bruce2bowser@gmail.com wrote:   
   > > On Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 7:47:10 PM UTC-4, Dim Witte wrote:   
   > >> On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 15:21:39 -0700, Winston_Smith   
   > >>  wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>> On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:48:29 -0400, AcWldzlZ47 wrote:   
   > >>>> Terry Coombs wrote on 6/28/2018 3:01 PM:   
   > >>>>> On 6/26/2018 9:13 PM, news18 wrote:   
   > >>>>>> If you looked at the charts, it really is natural gas that is leading   
   to   
   > >>>>>> the replacement of coal power generation.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>   Oh please please please use more natural gas ! Our property is on    
   > >>>>> the northern edge of a natural gas shale formation . We were under    
   > >>>>> contract for exploration several years ago - before the bottom fell    
   > >>>>> out on nat-gas prices . A well on our property would certainly improve    
   > >>>>> our financial position !   
   > >>>> After the fracking operation you won't be able to drink from your water    
   > >>>> wells anymore. The fracking chemicals will seep into your ground water    
   > >>>> and poison you.   
   > >>> I really hate to agree with the Canadian Wonder but this time he has   
   > >>> accidentally stumbled on the truth.   
   > >> Germans in WW-II were using powdered coal in some kind of slurry to   
   > >> fuel automobiles.  Supposed to be just oil interests that don't like   
   > >> that.   
   > >>   
   > >> Wonder what it would do to world economics if a way to produce a new   
   > >> coal fuel that had good environmental qualities?   
   >    
   > If it were cheap then government would tax it enough so that it wasn't   
   > cheap.   
      
   Prove it.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)