home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.environment      Discussions about the environment and ec      198,385 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 196,681 of 198,385   
   bruce2bowser@gmail.com to All   
   Re: Trump Fails To Save Coal !!   
   02 Jul 18 02:33:21   
   
   On Sunday, July 1, 2018 at 4:56:09 PM UTC-4, #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:   
   > On 07/01/2018 03:01 PM, mogulah@hotmail.com wrote:   
   > > On Saturday, June 30, 2018 at 10:29:09 PM UTC-4, #BeamMeUpScotty wrote:   
   > >> On 06/30/2018 10:51 AM, bruce2bowser@gmail.com wrote:   
   > >>> On Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 7:47:10 PM UTC-4, Dim Witte wrote:   
   > >>>> On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 15:21:39 -0700, Winston_Smith   
   > >>>>  wrote:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:48:29 -0400, AcWldzlZ47 wrote:   
   > >>>>>> Terry Coombs wrote on 6/28/2018 3:01 PM:   
   > >>>>>>> On 6/26/2018 9:13 PM, news18 wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>> If you looked at the charts, it really is natural gas that is   
   leading to   
   > >>>>>>>> the replacement of coal power generation.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>   Oh please please please use more natural gas ! Our property is on    
   > >>>>>>> the northern edge of a natural gas shale formation . We were under    
   > >>>>>>> contract for exploration several years ago - before the bottom fell    
   > >>>>>>> out on nat-gas prices . A well on our property would certainly   
   improve    
   > >>>>>>> our financial position !   
   > >>>>>> After the fracking operation you won't be able to drink from your   
   water    
   > >>>>>> wells anymore. The fracking chemicals will seep into your ground   
   water    
   > >>>>>> and poison you.   
   > >>>>> I really hate to agree with the Canadian Wonder but this time he has   
   > >>>>> accidentally stumbled on the truth.   
   > >>>> Germans in WW-II were using powdered coal in some kind of slurry to   
   > >>>> fuel automobiles.  Supposed to be just oil interests that don't like   
   > >>>> that.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Wonder what it would do to world economics if a way to produce a new   
   > >>>> coal fuel that had good environmental qualities?   
   > >>   
   > >> If it were cheap then government would tax it enough so that it wasn't   
   > >> cheap.   
   > >    
   > > Prove it.   
   >    
   > Look at cigarettes.   
      
   That cost states in health care dollars?  Wrong.   
      
   > Look at coal...   
      
   That cost companies in transportation and storage dollars?  Wrong.   
      
   > look at liquor.   
      
   That cost states in health care dollars?  Wrong.   
       
   > look at human labor.   
      
   It never was cheap.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca