From: hankkroll@gmail.com   
      
   On Sunday, September 29, 2019 at 11:11:55 AM UTC-8, Norm Why wrote:   
   > The Malizia II is not Eco-friendly.   
   >    
   > The Malizia II super yacht used by Greta Thunberg is not Eco-friendly.   
   > It was over-staffed, cramped and there are no toilets so human waste is   
   > collected in buckets and thrown overboard. The yacht uses tremendous   
   > electric power for its computing and telecommunications. What for? They   
   > are selling Eco-activism and the Malizia II. The Malizia II is so   
   > expensive that it is not possible to learn its price or rental cost.   
   > Only billionaires have access to that information. The yacht is so power   
   > hungry that none is left for internal lighting. It is like a coal mine   
   > inside. For power it uses silicon solar cells for when the Sun is   
   > shining. Silicon is not Eco-friendly. Huge amounts of power and toxic   
   > chemicals are used to smelt and refine it. I must be a hypocrite because   
   > I have a solar cell to power my calculator.   
   >    
   > When the Sun does not shine, the yacht uses underwater sea turbines.   
   > While these are Eco-friendly they slow down the racing yacht and are   
   > only used when the Sun does not shine. Does anyone indoctrinated in   
   > Eco-activism remember the concept of night time?   
   >    
   > The GROSS TONNAGE is 56 Tonnes. I have a friend with an ocean sailing   
   > yacht. Most of the tonnage is in the lead ballast in the keel. Lead   
   > metal is not Eco-friendly. Its outer shell is made of carbon fiber and   
   > fiberglass. I once worked in a fiberglass shop. Epoxy resin is neither   
   > Eco-friendly nor health friendly. One use breathing equipment. But wage   
   > slave labor means noting to billionaires.   
   >    
   > Sailing vessel used to use wood, rope and flax sails. Remember   
   > Christopher Columbus? That era was Eco-friendly.   
   >    
   > The lesson is that billionaires have means to control the world and to   
   > control your mind.   
      
   Correct me if I am wrong. Isn't the whole concept of being eco-friendly   
   reducing your carbon footprint? Right now CO2 is a trace gas at .033% of the   
   atmosphere while oxygen around 20% and Nitrogen 78%.I have news for you there   
   are more than one million    
   volcanoes under the Pacific Ocean in the Ring of fire--each spewing more CO2   
   than humans ever could. Oceans readily absorb CO2 and there isn't anything you   
   or anybody can do about it. They molten rock also heat the oceans of the world.   
      
   Another awakening: oceans cover 4/5 ths of the world and water has more heat   
   capacity per volume (Btu's/ft3/F +62. Steel 59, Rock or stone (30 percent air   
   gaps) 25, Soil 25-32, brick 23 to 25, Adobe 20, wood (pine or fir) 18. air   
   .018. Climates around    
   large lakes have warmer winters and colder summers due to the moderating   
   property of water. GW is not man made and neither is climate change. There   
   isn't anything we can do about it. The sun and the moon's gravity of 2E20   
   joules per second heat the earth    
   and keep it volcanic-ally active otherwise we would run out of CO2 and not be   
   able to grow food and die.   The book is: COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)