Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.environment    |    Discussions about the environment and ec    |    198,385 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 197,260 of 198,385    |
|    Norm Why to All    |
|    Infrared Raman Thermometry    |
|    26 Mar 20 15:53:22    |
      From: nobody@microsoft.com              I'm starting to get a handle on how an IR thermometer works, though I       have not yet checked the patent literature. When one has a new       measurement instrument in hand one asks questions about accuracy and       precision. First thing I did I pointed the red laser beam at my forehead       and pulled the trigger. I got a three digit reading about 3 C. belong       standard human temperature. I thought this can't be accurate. But it       is, I didn't have a fever! This was before I saw all the police and       military around the world checking for feverish Covid-19 patients. It's       always nice to be in front of the wave.              An IR thermometer measures the temperature of a surface. The red laser       bean is more than just and aiming device. There is a Fresnel lens that       focuses the reflected laser light. In standard IR spectroscopy a fused       alkali halide window is used.              The bottom of a cloud layer defines a surface. A reading of -46.6 C. is       meaningful. All those police and military around the will never believe       anything NASA, IPCC, NOAA or Greta says about temperatures. Satellite       measurements do not support their ideology either. I have published       about combustion, so I understand it. There are carbon particles so a       flame is a black body radiator that lacks a surface. I pointed the red       laser beam at a small lighter flame and pulled the trigger. The beam       went through the flame and gave a reading 5C. above ambient not 500+ C. as       expected              A surprising number of 'experts" and sheeple have no knowledge of       thermodynamics. Carl Sagan and his followers are clueless. It was said       that Eskimos/Inuit have 200 words for snow but no word for refrigerator.       English is even more ignorant. What does "Global Warming" mean? First       it is not global, it is the math impaired average of a bunch of NOAA       thermometers that only measure 'Urban Heat'. What does warming mean? Is       it higher temperatures or a greater quantity of heat energy? Both the       'experts' and sheeple have no clue.              Next time an 'expert' says the planet gained 0.001 C. last year, one       knows he is talking at the level of Greta Thunberg. Modern climatology       was never a science. Now that Covid-19 has popularized Infrared Raman       Thermometry, science will never be the same.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca