From: grmerrick@shaw.ca   
      
   On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:26:18 +1200, Eric Stevens   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 19:40:21 +0000 (UTC), R Kym Horsell   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>gordo  wrote:   
   >>> On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 08:17:20 +0000 (UTC), R Kym Horsell   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>Norm Why  wrote:   
   >>...   
   >>>>But kooks have made it silly-walks enough to start with.   
   >>>   
   >>> Monday?s findings, by researchers in the United States, Canada and   
   >>> Scotland, said evidence for global warming reached the five sigma   
   >>> level by 2005 in two of three sets of satellite data widely used by   
   >>> researchers, and in 2016 in the third"..   
   >>> Sigma 5 but the drongos persist.   
   >>   
   >>In the past year several researchers have demonstrated that   
   >>the human fingerprints on climate change are now clearly present in   
   >>weather data. Normally scientists had warned the noise in climate data   
   >>was loud enough to drown out any warming signal unless you had at least   
   >>30y worth of data, But the signal has grown exponentially over the past   
   >>100+ years and now statistically stands out in monthly or even   
   >>daily temperature, rainfall, storms occurence, etc.   
   >>   
   >>No wonder it's 5-sigma (i.e. a prob of being "wrong" around 0.00003%).   
   >   
   >5-sigma is a measure of correlation. It's not a measure of proof.   
   >   
   >What data do you believe it to be correlating?   
      
   There is no proof in science. I thought you knew that. You have been   
   told that over and over again.   
      
   --   
   This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.   
   https://www.avg.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)