XPost: alt.global-warming   
   From: kym@kymhorsell.com   
      
   In alt.global-warming Unum  wrote:   
   ...   
   >> You better tell China, India, Pakistan and Africa that they have it   
   >> all wrong.   
   > And what makes you think they have it wrong? You obviously haven't   
   > looked at the numbers.   
      
   The World Bank numbers show the percent of elec that is renewable   
   is following the ups and downs of atm CO2. Not so much that   
   CO2 controls the percentage but investors and the market generally   
   are forcing a change-over.   
      
   The s/w I use finds co2 lagged by 10y is the "best explanation"   
   with the model:   
      
   (AUTO CORR CORRECTION; estimated rho = 0.792900)   
   y = 0.0812681*exp(0.0144743*x)   
   Doubling Rate 47.89   
   beta in 0.0144743 +- 0.00326558  90% CI   
   P(beta>0.000000) = 0.999999 (T test)   
   r2 = 0.8132   
      
   OTOH the renewable numbers are the best explanation for   
   N Hem land temps 10y down the track.   
      
   (No auto corr)   
   y = -7.11599*log(x) + 21.2025   
   beta in -7.11599 +- 0.689813   
   P(beta<0.000000) = 1.000000   
   r2 = 0.968945   
      
   IOW greater percent of renewable power translates   
   to stat sig reduction in at least NH land temps. :)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)