Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.environment    |    Discussions about the environment and ec    |    198,385 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 197,857 of 198,385    |
|    MrPostingRobot@kymhorsell.com to All    |
|    African elephant on the decline since 20    |
|    05 Jul 21 14:48:09    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming              EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:       - We use the African Elephant Database reports of estimated animals        since ~1998 to predict the future of elephant over the next 20-100y.       - Adjusting for "effort" that went into gathering the reported numbers        we find African elephant apparently peaked around 2006 and have been        in slow decline since.       - Using an AI s/w with access to 10s of 1000s of datasets we find the        sea surface temperature in a region that includes W Greenland and        the Antarctic Peninsula predicts more than 80% of the year-to-year        variation in African elephant numbers.       - Unfortunately the temperature of the region is on the increase        around 1.4C/cent, indicating elephant numbers are predicted to 1/2        before that century is up.       - Because of animal characteristics -- social grouping and intelligence --        it's expected real numbers over the next 100y are likely to involve a        crash at some point with small groups of smaller animals perhaps        surviving in tiny pockets across the continent.                     Despite a huge and continent wide effort to boost the survival of       African elephant, the species seems to be on a track to decline.              According to periodic reports from the AED numbers of animals peaked       in 2006 and have declined since. Numbers are estimated for each region       of their range across central Africa and the results combined for the       survey reports. Ground observations of animals, aircraft surveys,       counts of dung heaps and the opinion of local farmers and other       experts are all combined to obtain a total number of animals.              And we can use some data science techniques to massage that and see if       we can make a reasonably robust prediction about where the numbers are       headed.              The various reports give the total estimates since the 90s as:              Year Estimated numbers       1995 285233       1998 301733       2002 402067       2006 471836 <-- max       2013 404247       2015 395593              Like field estimates of other endangered animals there are many       niggling little problems in gathering this kind of data. E.g. the       majority of the "number" above comes from aircraft surveys of       herds. And it's a truism the harder you look the more you find. So we       have to adjust the estimates by the "amount of effort" that went in to       assembling them. Various data are available to estimate "effort" --       e.g. amount of project funding (adjusted for inflation, of course),       manpower available, number of miles flown for aircraft surveys       (e.g. length of transect/transects) -- and we can combine all that       using high-fallutin methods to come up with:              Year Adjusted elephant numbers       1995 361829       1998 367553       2002 465764       2006 521189 <-- max       2013 412833       2015 395593              And from these numbers we can interpolate missing years to obtain an       estimate for all the years from approx 1990 to 2020. Which we can       then throw into a little program to discover what out there in the       world seems to be influencing elephant numbers in Africa.              And the top10 answers we find after search 10s of 1000s of data       series are:              "Suspect" dataset Lag(y) LogTrans R2       world-70 2 y 0.83462826       sduah_globe6SoPol 3 y 0.81257976       arc-40 5 y 0.78078380       sdcambodia 2 0.77924226       ant70 4 y 0.73949191       ant80 4 y 0.73390412       sdireland 3 y 0.72508670       presband20 3 y 0.72354974       world150 0 0.70189185       maxuah_lsNH 4 0.69806836              So the "best" simple predictor of African elephant numbers we can find       is the SST of oceans along the longitude segment 70W-60W that goes       through the waters off W Greenland and the Antarctic peninsula -- key       weather determiners for most of the globe.              The annual avg SST of this region lagged by 2 years matches 83% of the       elephant count data so we expect it will be able to predict at least       numbers a decade or 2 into the future given it is based on reports for       the last 20+ years.              But the results are not happy. The SST along the segment are on the       increase:              Model for world-70 1990-2020:       (Serial corr detected; estimated rho = 0.449530)       y = 0.0141806*x + -12.6978       beta in 0.0141806 +- 0.00665622 90% CI       alpha in -12.6978 +- 7.35401       P(beta>0.000000) = 0.999430       r2 = 0.31930471              I.e. SST in the region are presently increasing around 1.4 degC/cent --       similar to the rise of avg global temps.                     And the relationship with African elephant numbers over the past 20y       is inversely related to temperature -- the higher the SST the lower       the elephant count. The rise in elephant numbers between 1998 and 2006       is matched by a decline in SST in the region during those years --       presumably due to factors like melting glacier ice entering the seas       off W Greenland and the Antarctic peninsula. After ~2006 overall ocean       warming took over and SST started to climb again, in parallel with the       reported decline in elephant numbers.              The best model linking "world-70" and AED reported numbers is:              (Log transform enabled).       (Lagging 2y).       y = 7.93112e+09*exp(-0.619429*x)       Halving Rate 1.12C       beta in -0.619429 +- 0.124802 90% CI       alpha in 22.7941 +- 1.9685 = [20.8256, 24.7626]       P(beta<0.000000) = 1.000000       calculated Spearman corr = -0.850490       Critical Spearman = 0.582500 2-sided at 1%; reject H0:no_link       r2 = 0.83462826              Binned data:       Year Av SST(degC) #Elephants Model-est #Elephants        1998 15.9376 416658 409158        1999 15.7879 441211 448913        2000 15.7094 465764 471281        2001 15.7086 479620 471515        2002 15.7115 493476 470669*(1sd diff)        2003 15.6984 507333 474503*        2004 15.5224 521189 529159 <-- max animals        & min SST        2005 15.6614 505710 485504*        2006 15.6126 490230 500404        2007 15.6867 474751 477955        2008 15.682 459271 479348*        2009 15.7718 443792 453413        2010 15.974 428312 400036*        2011 15.8595 412833 429439*        2012 15.9257 404213 412185        2013 15.9789 395593 398824        2014 15.9022 395593 418229*                            The model shows the data fit the (adjusted) report numbers well.       There are no 2s outliers and the 1s outliers fall on both sides of the       model curve.              The stats finds the model is significant at 90% (T-test) and 99% (rank       test) meaning there is almost 999 chances in 1000 the SST data       "explains" or predicts what is happening to African elephant numbers.                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca