XPost: alt.astronomy, alt.global-warming, talk.politics.guns
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: kymhorsell@gmail.com
In alt.global-warming useapen wrote:
> Update: On Oct. 25, NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center released an
> "updated prediction" for Solar Cycle 25. The new forecast more closely
> matches the timeframe laid out in this feature and agrees with the
> predictions of experts who spoke to Live Science about the upcoming solar
> maximum.
...
The upcoming solar maximum looks lower than previous ones. At least on the
plots. :)
It's an long-standing myth at sunpots somehow affect global temperatures.
But, again, the data says no in 3 different ways.
The plots of the numbers upto mid 2023 is here:
.
On A.G-W we had a long running arument at one point where "someone"
claimed to have proved that if the surface of the sun changes its
temperature my a "mili Kelvin" it would affect the earth enough to
raise its avg temp 1C. But it turned out that guy could not work
his algebra and the correct solution to his equation showed 1 mili Kelvin
at the sun would affect the earth by the ration of Te/Ts where Te
is the abs temp (deg K) for the earth and Ts is the abs temp of the
surface of the sun -- i.e. 300/5000. You do the math. :)
--
[New Hillbilly Theory: No suspots cause cold;
so mo sunspots -> warm eben at exactly same time?:]
On Thursday, November 14, 2019 at 2:39:37 PM UTC+11, JTEM is Remarkably
Flexible wrote:
> "Extreme Weather" the bots are calling it, trying to pretend
> that it's so hot that it's cold...
> We're in a solar minimum. That's why it's cold.
[Large Sunspot Count in Arctic:]
Daily Mirror @DailyMirror 14 Nov 2019 06:56Z
Kids play in Arctic seas as 22C heatwave grips climate change
frontline #MirrorClimateCrisis
mirror.co.uk/news/world-new...
pic.twitter.com/9sVOQZp8jM
Korntydicshun?
-- rkh, 14 Nov 2019 07:47Z
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
