Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.environment    |    Discussions about the environment and ec    |    198,385 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 198,088 of 198,385    |
|    Internetado to All    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?U3R1ZGVudHMnc8KgY3JlZGliaWxpdH    |
|    27 Jan 24 13:59:44    |
      XPost: sci.misc       From: internetado@bbs.alt119.net              Abstract              The rise of social media platforms and the subsequent lack of       traditional gatekeeping mechanisms contribute to the multiplied spread       of scientific misinformation. Particularly in these new media spaces,       there is a rising need for science education in fostering a science       media literacy that enables students to evaluate the credibility of       scientific information. A key determinant of a successful credibility       evaluation is the effectiveness of the criteria students apply in this       process. However, research suggests that existing credibility criteria       are often not integrated into students' actual social media evaluation       behavior. This hints to a lack of transferability of the existing       criteria. As a consequence, knowledge about how learners evaluate       credibility in social media is a first step in closing this gap. In the       present study, we report results from six focus groups with 21       10th-grade students (M = 15 years, 57% female, 38% male, 5% nonbinary)       about their usage of different credibility criteria in the case of       social media posts about climate change. The data were analyzed through       qualitative content analysis and as a first step assigned to       established credibility dimensions of content (what?) and       source-related criteria (who?). Additionally, given the complexity of       social media, we also added a composition-based category (how?). In a       second analysis step, we adapted our subcategories to the recently       proposed credibility heuristic by Osborne and Pimentel. The findings       suggest that students generally take criteria from all three heuristic       credibility dimensions into account and combine different criteria when       evaluating the credibility of scientific information in social media.       Based on the application of the credibility criteria to the heuristic,       implications for the development of teaching materials for fostering       science media literacy are discussed.              https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.21855?af=R       --       [s]       Internetado.       --- You have a fine personality..but not for a human.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca