XPost: alt.home.repair, alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy
XPost: fl.politics, fl.general
From: robberbaron@invalid.ut
micky wrote:
> In alt.home.repair, on Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:07:20 -0600, citizen winston
> smith wrote:
>
>> On 9/18/2024 10:03 PM, Bob F wrote:
>>> trump wants to have nuclear war with hurricanes
>>
>>
>> You are an unhinged DISINFORMATION AGENT!
>>
>> https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-once-suggested-china-sh
oting-us-with-man-made-hurricanes-2022-5
>>
>> Trump once asked his aides if China had developed a 'Hurricane Gun' that
>> could be used on the US: report
>>
>> https://abc7chicago.com/why-not-bomb-a-hurricane-nuclear-dona
d-trump-president/5494385/
>>
>> According to a report, President Donald Trump once suggested that the US
>> could try dropping a nuclear bomb into the eye of an approaching
>> hurricane to knock it off its course. Which, for the record, the
>> President has denied he ever suggested such a thing.
>>
>> The story by Axios that President Trump wanted to blow up large
>> hurricanes with nuclear weapons prior to reaching shore is ridiculous. I
>> never said this. Just more FAKE NEWS!
>>
>> — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 26, 2019
>
> That trump denies he said this does not at all mean that he did not say
> it. He lies about anything and everything, including what he has said,
> all the time.
>>
>> NOAA's Neal Dorst writes this:
>>
>> "If someone can figure out a way to harness that energy, the more power
>> to them. They could earn millions of dollars and the gratitude of
>> everyone on the shore."
>>
>> Such a wide array of storm prevention proposals is a testament to
>> people's concern and ingenuity, though not necessarily their scientific
>> acumen.
>>
>> We should not nuke hurricanes.
>>
>> — Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) August 26, 2019
>>
>>
>> https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-nuke-hurricanes/
>>
>> Rating:
>> Unproven
>> Unproven
>
> Right. Not everyone is willing to rat on him, especially on something
> that is not important. It's possible whoever said it did happen was
> lying, but I doubt it. Because I saw him suggeting "injecting a
> disinfectant to [cure Covid], you know, almost a cleaning." That's far
> more stupid than suggesting a nuclear bomb to destroy a hurricane, since
> your own first link says that many people have suggested that.
You are far more stupid than anyne here imagined:
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2007068007A1/en
Use of a disinfectant for treating respiratory tract infections
Abstract
The invention provides method of administering a treatment to a patient
infected with an infective agent, said method comprising forming
inhalable particles of a disinfectant, inhaling the disinfectant
particles to deposit the disinfectant on the infected surfaces of the
respiratory tract, sinuses, and the lungs, and repeating the inhalation
periodically until the level of infection has decreased. The invention
further provides a single use container for use in the method and the
use of a disinfectant in the preparation of a medicament.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484715/
Inhalation therapies are attractive means for the treatment of
respiratory infections because of a few recognizable advantages [3].
In comparison with other administration routes, pulmonary delivery can
directly deliver the drug into the lung, and promptly allow for a high
therapeutic concentration at the site of action with lower doses,
minimizing undesirable systemic absorption and side effects [4].
Nonetheless, the options of antibacterial medicine that are formulated
and approved for inhaled applications are limited [5]. Table TableII
summarized the approved inhaled antibiotic therapies to target bacterial
lung infections. While they are effective against lung infections caused
by the antibiotic-sensitive strains, increasing therapeutic challenges
arouse from the rapid emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Therefore, it is imperative to develop new/alternative inhaled
antibacterial agents for clinical application in the post-antibiotic era.
> https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52407177
>
> He also suggested using a light to cure covid, probably because hanging
> clothes on a line with sunlight, UV, and fresh air is suposed to
> disinfect them, actually does so afaik. And Dr. Birx had to nod as if
> was worth trying, for fear of his anger if she contradicted him.
>
You really need an education:
https://forbetterscience.com/2020/04/27/supposing-you-brought-th
-light-inside-the-body/
The other approach which apparently remains viable, would be to
illuminate the body with UV light, from the inside. These are the
kakistocratic times we live in, but if you think there is no science
behind Trump’s teachings: WAIT!
The “light inside the body” therapy against COVID-19 is exactly what the
US startup Aytu Biosciences offers to do for you, in collaboration with
the research hospital Cedars-Sinai in Los Angeles. Their scientists
already developed a UV light rod to shove up your bottom in order to
treat bacterial infections in the intestine, only that nobody was
interested to buy it until now. Or to invest. Even Aytu’s COVID-19
antibody test kit was not really desired. But the bizarre offer of
curing COVID-19 by shining light up the arse, that has made it.
The company’s stock which rightly fell to near-worthless, now gained
manifold in value and made some people lots of money.
Scientists at Cedars-Sinai are developing an ultraviolet light that is
inserted into the lungs of coronavirus patients to kill the virus living
there.
Trump was right again about "inserting UV light."
It's called the #Healight
Watch
pic.twitter.com/naGETF2Mfo
— Mark Dice (@MarkDice) April 25, 2020
--
⛨ 🥐🥖🗼🤪
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
