XPost: rec.food.cooking, alt.home.repair, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.california   
   From: kymhorsell@gmail.com   
      
   In sci.environment T  wrote:   
   > On 10/6/24 17:10, R Kym Horsell wrote:   
   >> Youz gots two unnerstan -- the fossil bidness is based on massive   
   >> subsidies. They make 3,4,5x more in taxpayer support than they do   
   >> actually selling their dubious products.   
   >   
   > You should check you source before posting narratives.   
   >   
      
   You seem to have cut whatever. Skert?   
      
   --   
   The US fossil industries are subsidised to the tune of about $8000 per   
   househouse each year.   
   The industry overall survives on tax breaks and direct payments to   
   the tune of 3,4,5 times their actual revenue.   
   By sheer coincidence this is about an economic efficiency around   
   the same as the efficiency of most internal combision engines.   
   When you pay $100 for a tank of fas at the pump it must give you   
   a fuzzy warm feeling that $80 of it just goes to cause pollution and   
   doesn't push the car along at all.   
   Any other industry with that kind of "surcharge" would have been put   
   out of bidness long ago. Fortunately, it's mostly run along monopolistic lines.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)