XPost: rec.food.cooking, alt.home.repair, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.california   
   From: robberbaron@invalid.ut   
      
   K Wills wrote:   
   >> Gaslight much?   
   >       So there is no evidence and you lied. Got it.   
   >       Care to explain why you lied? Or do you really HATE truth and   
   > honesty too much? Time will tell, I suppose.   
      
   When your seamy past is replayed you always project it upon the respondent.   
      
      
   https://casetext.com/case/state-v-wills-26   
      
   https://groups.google.com/g/rec.autos.misc/c/Ou60H28ExUw   
      
   I. Background Facts and Proceedings.   
      
   Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called   
   the local police to report that a car   
   alarm sounded in the resident's   
   neighborhood. The city dispatched a police   
   officer to the location. Observing nothing   
   unusual, the officer left the area, only   
   to be stopped a couple of blocks later   
   by a person who informed the officer he   
   had witnessed someone running from the   
   area of the car alarm. As the officer   
   started driving back to the area of the   
   car alarm, he noticed a person walking   
   on the sidewalk. The officer asked the   
   person, a minor, if he had noticed anybody   
   running from the area. The minor answered   
   that he had not. While the officer and   
   another officer were speaking to the minor,   
   another resident of the neighborhood   
   arrived in her car and informed the   
   officers that she had observed two people,   
   one of whom was heavy set with a blinking   
   light on his back pocket, walking in the   
   area of her neighbor's residence. She   
   observed the heavier-set individual, later   
   identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's   
   attached garage through an unlocked service   
   door. She further observed a smaller   
   individual standing by a van parked in   
   the neighbor's driveway.   
      
   The officers eventually let the minor leave   
   even though they found a large amount of   
   coins, a flashlight, and an electronic   
   pocket organizer in his pockets. After   
   releasing the minor, the police officers   
   drove to the residence where the neighbor   
   observed the two suspicious people and   
   woke the owner. The owner, his wife,   
   and two daughters were in the residence   
   sleeping at the time. After a search   
   of his vehicles, the owner discovered   
   change and an electronic pocket organizer   
   were missing from the vehicles. The   
   owner's daughter reported a diamond ring   
   and some change were missing from her   
   vehicle. The officers then contacted   
   the minor's parents, who informed the   
   officers the minor was with Wills. After   
   the officers questioned the minor again,   
   he admitted his involvement in the theft   
   and implicated Wills in the burglary.   
   Although Wills denied involvement in the   
   burglary, the officers arrested him.   
      
   The State filed a trial information   
   charging Wills with second-degree   
   burglary. The State later amended the   
   information to include two additional   
   charges of burglary in the third degree   
   and using a juvenile to commit an   
   indictable offense.   
      
   The jury returned a verdict finding Wills   
   guilty of the crimes of burglary in the   
   second degree, burglary in the third   
   degree, and using a juvenile to commit   
   an indictable offense. Wills appeals his   
   conviction for second-degree burglary   
   claiming ineffective assistance of   
   counsel.   
      
   --   
   ⛨ 🥐🥖🗼🤪   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)