XPost: alt.home.repair, alt.global-warming, can.politics   
   XPost: aus.politics, nz.politics   
   From: goober@nospam.nospam   
      
   De-Trois-Leaning  wrote in   
   news:vhl3a9$67q8$1@dont-email.me:   
      
   > Cindy Hamilton wrote:   
   >> On 2024-11-20, Alexandria Ocasio-Mayorkis   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:   
   >>>> On 2024-11-19, Greta Thongturd   
   >>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>> On OANN's Weekly Briefing this weekend, I saw a video clip of   
   >>>>> President Trump and Joey Diapers having a chit-chat in front of a   
   >>>>> fireplace at the White House.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The fireplace had a roaring 75k BTU gas log fire going.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Why do the democrat climate change nazis ban America's natural gas   
   >>>>> stoves yet have a natural gas fireplace at the White House?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> They aren't banned.  You can go right down to Home Depot and   
   >>>> buy one for your hovel.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Yabbut the libturds tell us fireplaces cause climate change.   
   >>   
   >> "Yabbut" ?  Is that what passes for rhetoric in your bubble?   
   >>   
   > https://thehighwire.com/editorial/new-peer-reviewed-study-co2-has-zero-   
   > impact-on-climate-change/   
   >   
   > Share on Facebook   
   > Share on X   
   > Share on Parler   
   > Share on Gab   
   > Share on Telegram   
   > Share on Reddit   
   > Share on WhatsApp   
   > Popular   
   > Study Shows Ketogenic Diet Shrinks Pancreatic Tumors   
   > Knowledge is Power: The Corruption Behind Seed Oils   
   > Funded by BARDA, Japan Approves Next-Generation Self-Amplifying mRNA   
   > Jabs A powerful peer-reviewed scientific study delivers substantial   
   > evidence that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the atmosphere have   
   > zero impact on the Earth’s global temperatures. The study concludes   
   > that even though most publications attempt to depict a catastrophic   
   > future for our planet due to an increase in CO2, there is serious   
   > doubt that this is, in fact, the case. Instead, the study authors   
   > deduced that their research unequivocally means that the officially   
   > presented narrative that human activity is causing a detrimental CO2   
   > increase on Earth’s climate is merely a hypothesis rather than a   
   > substantiated reality.   
   >   
   > The study, published in Science Direct in March 2024, confirms that   
   > the warming effect of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is naturally   
   > limited, with the limit having been reached decades ago. The study   
   > also confirms what climatologist Dr. Judith Curry has stated, which is   
   > that the “manufactured consensus of scientists at the request of   
   > policymakers” regarding climate change is all a ruse to push an   
   > agenda that has nothing to do with climate change. She insists that   
   > “Earth has survived far bigger insults that what human beings are   
   > doing.”   
   >   
   > In a 2022 interview, Curry remarked that the basic facts of the   
   > climate situation are clear—global temperatures have been warming,   
   > humans emit CO2 into the atmosphere, and CO2 has an infrared emission   
   > spectra that, overall, acts to warm the planet. However, after that,   
   > there is much disagreement over the most consequential issues   
   > propagated to fuel the climate change narrative, such as how much of   
   > the warming has been caused by humans and how significant is   
   > human-caused warming relative to solar-variability, ocean circulation   
   > patterns, and so on?   
   >   
   > Why are politically active scientists exaggerating the truth for   
   > political objectives? Many are now certain that, like the COVID-19   
   > pandemic, the massive climate change scheme is about greed, power, and   
   > control. Curry, Professor Emeritus and former chair of the School of   
   > Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology,   
   > has become known as an outspoken scientist who doubts the   
   > “scientific consensus” on climate change. Unsurprisingly, akin to   
   > the doctors who dared speak up about the deadly mRNA COVID-19 shots,   
   > Curry was “academically, pretty much finished off” and   
   > “essentially unhirable.” But that has not stopped her from   
   > speaking up. When asked how far from reality the picture of doom and   
   > gloom painted by those pushing the climate agenda really is, Curry   
   > stated:   
   >   
   > “It’s very far from gloom and doom. People are being sued left and   
   > right over bad weather. Governments, oil companies, and everything   
   > because they’re not doing enough.   
   >   
   > People who think that they can control the climate… It’s just a   
   > pipe dream. Even if we went to net zero, we would barely notice. It   
   > would be hard to detect any change in the climate. The climate is   
   > going to do what the climate’s going to do. And there’s a lot of   
   > inertia in the system.   
   >   
   > If the carbon dioxide that we’ve put in is as important, as bad as   
   > some people seem to think, those effects are going to be with us for a   
   > very, very long time. And stopping now isn’t going to change that   
   > trajectory very much.   
   >   
   > So, we must look forward and try to understand what’s happened. But   
   > thinking that we’re going to control the climate by going to net   
   > zero very quickly is not good.”   
   >   
   > Curry remarked that even when you look more recently at the weather in   
   > the United States, for example, it was much worse in the 1930s by any   
   > measure than it is now. When you look at the data, she insists that   
   > period was inundated with forest fires, droughts, heat waves, and   
   > hurricanes. It makes no sense to rapidly revamp our entire energy   
   > infrastructure to rely on wind turbines and solar energy, which   
   > require a massive land and water footprint.   
   >   
   > According to Curry, the most significant danger is if “we do really   
   > stupid stuff like destroy our energy infrastructure before we have   
   > something better to replace it with.” She believes the biggest   
   > climate risk right now is a so-called transition risk, the risk of   
   > rapidly getting rid of fossil fuels. Dr. Curry is right. Even if   
   > society transitions to all wind and solar, massive amounts of fossil   
   > fuels will be needed to do all the mining, establish the supply   
   > chains, transport, and everything else. So, in the near term, even if   
   > the plan is to use all renewable wind and solar energy, we will need   
   > large amounts of fossil fuels to get there. “People just repeat   
   > these mantras without any thought,” Curry said, adding, “It’s   
   > not a good place.”   
   >   
   > And now, following Dr. Curry’s sound advice and insight, we have the   
   > Science Direct study reaffirming the madness bestowed upon humanity by   
   > a despicable cohort of greedy souls. Conducted by researchers from the   
   > Institute of Optoelectronics, Military University of Technology in   
   > Warsaw, Poland, the study authors found that even if we dug up all the   
   > world’s coal, extracted all the world’s oil, and burned it in one   
   > giant pyre, the CO2 emissions from that endeavor would not heat up   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)