XPost: rec.food.cooking, alt.global-warming   
   From: cc@invalid.cc   
      
   On 11/24/2024 3:37 AM, D wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   > On Sat, 23 Nov 2024, clams casino wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 11/23/2024 2:43 PM, D wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> On Sat, 23 Nov 2024, Coogan's Bluff wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:   
   >>>>> As if universities are the entire world.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> where do their students/leaders migrate off to?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> As we know, the conflicts   
   >>>>> in academia are so bitter because the stakes are so small.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You really are one of the dumbest cunts I have ever seen!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Peer grant herding and the climate change hoax  - learn!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> https://thehighwire.com/editorial/new-peer-reviewed-study-c   
   2-has-zero-impact-on-climate-change/   
   >>>>   
   >>>> A powerful peer-reviewed scientific study delivers substantial   
   >>>> evidence that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the atmosphere have   
   >>>> zero impact on the Earth’s global temperatures. The study concludes   
   >>>> that even though most publications attempt to depict a catastrophic   
   >>>> future for our planet due to an increase in CO2, there is serious   
   >>>> doubt that this is, in fact, the case. Instead, the study authors   
   >>>> deduced that their research unequivocally means that the officially   
   >>>> presented narrative that human activity is causing a detrimental CO2   
   >>>> increase on Earth’s climate is merely a hypothesis rather than a   
   >>>> substantiated reality.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The study, published in Science Direct in March 2024, confirms that   
   >>>> the warming effect of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is naturally   
   >>>> limited, with the limit having been reached decades ago. The study   
   >>>> also confirms what climatologist Dr. Judith Curry has stated, which   
   >>>> is that the “manufactured consensus of scientists at the request of   
   >>>> policymakers” regarding climate change is all a ruse to push an   
   >>>> agenda that has nothing to do with climate change. She insists that   
   >>>> “Earth has survived far bigger insults that what human beings are   
   >>>> doing.”   
   >>>>   
   >>>> In a 2022 interview, Curry remarked that the basic facts of the   
   >>>> climate situation are clear—global temperatures have been warming,   
   >>>> humans emit CO2 into the atmosphere, and CO2 has an infrared   
   >>>> emission spectra that, overall, acts to warm the planet. However,   
   >>>> after that, there is much disagreement over the most consequential   
   >>>> issues propagated to fuel the climate change narrative, such as how   
   >>>> much of the warming has been caused by humans and how significant is   
   >>>> human-caused warming relative to solar-variability, ocean   
   >>>> circulation patterns, and so on?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Why are politically active scientists exaggerating the truth for   
   >>>> political objectives? Many are now certain that, like the COVID-19   
   >>>> pandemic, the massive climate change scheme is about greed, power,   
   >>>> and control. Curry, Professor Emeritus and former chair of the   
   >>>> School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of   
   >>>> Technology, has become known as an outspoken scientist who doubts   
   >>>> the “scientific consensus” on climate change. Unsurprisingly, akin   
   >>>> to the doctors who dared speak up about the deadly mRNA COVID-19   
   >>>> shots, Curry was “academically, pretty much finished off” and   
   >>>> “essentially unhirable.” But that has not stopped her from speaking   
   >>>> up. When asked how far from reality the picture of doom and gloom   
   >>>> painted by those pushing the climate agenda really is, Curry stated:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> “It’s very far from gloom and doom. People are being sued left and   
   >>>> right over bad weather. Governments, oil companies, and everything   
   >>>> because they’re not doing enough.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> People who think that they can control the climate… It’s just a pipe   
   >>>> dream. Even if we went to net zero, we would barely notice. It would   
   >>>> be hard to detect any change in the climate. The climate is going to   
   >>>> do what the climate’s going to do. And there’s a lot of inertia in   
   >>>> the system.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If the carbon dioxide that we’ve put in is as important, as bad as   
   >>>> some people seem to think, those effects are going to be with us for   
   >>>> a very, very long time. And stopping now isn’t going to change that   
   >>>> trajectory very much.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> So, we must look forward and try to understand what’s happened. But   
   >>>> thinking that we’re going to control the climate by going to net   
   >>>> zero very quickly is not good.”   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Curry remarked that even when you look more recently at the weather   
   >>>> in the United States, for example, it was much worse in the 1930s by   
   >>>> any measure than it is now. When you look at the data, she insists   
   >>>> that period was inundated with forest fires, droughts, heat waves,   
   >>>> and hurricanes. It makes no sense to rapidly revamp our entire   
   >>>> energy infrastructure to rely on wind turbines and solar energy,   
   >>>> which require a massive land and water footprint.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> According to Curry, the most significant danger is if “we do really   
   >>>> stupid stuff like destroy our energy infrastructure before we have   
   >>>> something better to replace it with.” She believes the biggest   
   >>>> climate risk right now is a so-called transition risk, the risk of   
   >>>> rapidly getting rid of fossil fuels. Dr. Curry is right. Even if   
   >>>> society transitions to all wind and solar, massive amounts of fossil   
   >>>> fuels will be needed to do all the mining, establish the supply   
   >>>> chains, transport, and everything else. So, in the near term, even   
   >>>> if the plan is to use all renewable wind and solar energy, we will   
   >>>> need large amounts of fossil fuels to get there. “People just repeat   
   >>>> these mantras without any thought,” Curry said, adding, “It’s not a   
   >>>> good place.”   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And now, following Dr. Curry’s sound advice and insight, we have the   
   >>>> Science Direct study reaffirming the madness bestowed upon humanity   
   >>>> by a despicable cohort of greedy souls. Conducted by researchers   
   >>>> from the Institute of Optoelectronics, Military University of   
   >>>> Technology in Warsaw, Poland, the study authors found that even if   
   >>>> we dug up all the world’s coal, extracted all the world’s oil, and   
   >>>> burned it in one giant pyre, the CO2 emissions from that endeavor   
   >>>> would not heat up planet Earth. Indeed, this is because carbon   
   >>>> dioxide does not cause the Earth to warm up indefinitely.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> As reported by Slay News, much like a sponge, the Earth’s atmosphere   
   >>>> can only hold so much, meaning that carbon dioxide cannot increase   
   >>>> temperatures anymore since the saturation point was reached a long   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)